메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비평문학회 비평문학 비평문학 제30호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
87 - 107 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There are some similarities and differences between Kim Kwang Gyun and He Qifang in theories of their poetries. The purpose of this paper is to find and draw a comparison of them 1) Both Kim Kwang Gyun and He Qifang have actively ackonwledged and faced up to the development and change of the times, and put forward new poetic forms which are compatible with the times. 2) Both of them have considered poets as the leader of the changeble times. In order to reconcile the developmental times, they have asked the poets to elevate their minds. 3) Both of them have thought that life is the source of poetry, 4) In the selection of poetry language , both of them have thought that poets should choose the modern language which is the result of the developmental times. Kim Kwang Gyun suggests using urban language which consistents with urban life, while He Qifang places emphasis on modern spoken language. 5) Comparing with the theory of Kim Kwang Gyun’s Formal Thought, He Qifang has his own special Representation Function Thinking. Though He Qifang’s theory is not a systematic theory , it has a surpring resemblance to Kim Kwang Gyun’s, The little difference is that Kim Kwang Gyun proposed Formal Thought consciously in order to meet the need of the developmental times, while He Qifang’s Representation Function Thinking is based on the way of his writing. This way was beyond his personal thinking and was developed when he was young.
The comparative study of Chinese and Korean modernism begins with the study of Kim Kwang Gyun and He Qifang’s poetries, In this paper, I first draw a comparison with their poetry theotries, and this will be the base of studying their poetries in the future.

목차

1. 서론
2. 김광균과 하기방 시론의 공통점과 차이점
3. ‘형태의 사상성’과 ‘구상운작사유(具象運作思維)’
4. 결론
【參考文獻】
【Abstracts】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-809-015827792