지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Post-liberation Controversy over the North Korean worker unions' nature, and traits exhibited by the North Korean labor policy in the same era
North Korean Socialists started to exhibit a new stance toward labor, when the national purpose shifted from 'revolution' to 'construction' after the liberation in 1945. And over such situation, differences in opinions led to a debate in 1947 over the nature of the labor unions. Oh Gi Seob argued that the job unions should organize the workers for production, but they should also fight for the interest of the workers, the laborers. Yet this argument received criticism from inside the Labor party, as an argument that would put the workers on the opposite site of state and encourage them to fight the authorities. At the time, most of the Socialists including Kim I1 Seong, were considering 'nationalization' as part of Socialism.
Yet their logic, figuring that working hard would automatically ensure and protect the interest of the labor class, while merely emphasizing the fact that production relationships had changed over the years, was in danger of shoving aside the rights and opinions of the labor population as a secondary one. In reality, the role of the job union was being reduced to merely overseeing the labor efficiency enhancement. In this environment, some of the laborers started to exhibit an attitude pursuing their own private interests ahead of the interest of the group or the state, in other words, the interest of the whole. So, to attract the labor force, the deployment of economic incentives came to be considered as a viable option. This whole situation shows that in spite of the 'ideology-inclined thoughts possessed by the Socialists regarding the industry area, they had to employ policies based upon the 'lower foundation' as well. This means that the North Korean People's democracy could have evolved in two directions, either regulating the 'reality' based upon abstract ideology, or regulating the pace of leaning over ideology based upon the reality it was standing on.
North Korean Socialists started to exhibit a new stance toward labor, when the national purpose shifted from 'revolution' to 'construction' after the liberation in 1945. And over such situation, differences in opinions led to a debate in 1947 over the nature of the labor unions. Oh Gi Seob argued that the job unions should organize the workers for production, but they should also fight for the interest of the workers, the laborers. Yet this argument received criticism from inside the Labor party, as an argument that would put the workers on the opposite site of state and encourage them to fight the authorities. At the time, most of the Socialists including Kim I1 Seong, were considering 'nationalization' as part of Socialism.
Yet their logic, figuring that working hard would automatically ensure and protect the interest of the labor class, while merely emphasizing the fact that production relationships had changed over the years, was in danger of shoving aside the rights and opinions of the labor population as a secondary one. In reality, the role of the job union was being reduced to merely overseeing the labor efficiency enhancement. In this environment, some of the laborers started to exhibit an attitude pursuing their own private interests ahead of the interest of the group or the state, in other words, the interest of the whole. So, to attract the labor force, the deployment of economic incentives came to be considered as a viable option. This whole situation shows that in spite of the 'ideology-inclined thoughts possessed by the Socialists regarding the industry area, they had to employ policies based upon the 'lower foundation' as well. This means that the North Korean People's democracy could have evolved in two directions, either regulating the 'reality' based upon abstract ideology, or regulating the pace of leaning over ideology based upon the reality it was standing on.
목차
머리말
1. 해방이후 북한의 경제재건 구상과 생산력 확충방식
2. 국유화의 인식차에 따른 노동조합 성격논쟁
3. 노동정책에 반영된 ‘이념’ 지향과 ‘현실’ 토대의 공존
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (101)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Study of a Korean Labor Union
Korea Journal
1983 .04
-
1970년대 청계피복노동조합 노동자와 지식인의 연대관계형성 및 상호영향
한국사학보
2011 .08
-
1945~1950년 북한의 사회주의적 노동관과 직업동맹의 노동통제
역사와현실
2010 .09
-
정부수립 후 노동위원회의 설치와 노동문제
동방학지
2008 .01
-
Recent Korean Labor Novels : "Labor" Literature vs. Labor "Literature"
Korea Journal
1989 .03
-
노동 소설의 새로운 모색
어문연구
2007 .01
-
國民政府의 勞動政策과 上海 勞動界
동양사학연구
2001 .07
-
1979년, 그녀들의 선택 - YH노동조합 신민당사 농성
역사비평
2019 .08
-
‘일’과 젠더: 쏘로우의 「월든」과 루이자 메이 올코트의 「일」
근대영미소설
2011 .01
-
1950년대 한국의 노동운동에서 대안적 전통
역사비평
2009 .05
-
노동체험의 소설적 형상화 : 이북명의 후기 노동소설
어문론집
2006 .09
-
4월혁명기 전남지역의 노동조합과 노동쟁의
지방사와 지방문화
2013 .05
-
중국의 경제성장 패러다임 전환과 노동정책의 변화
중국지식네트워크
2018 .01
-
반공이데올로기에 기반한 노동담론의 지형(1945~1950)
역사학보
2018 .06
-
1920년대 전반 군산지역의 노동운동 - ‘군산노동연맹회’와 항만하역 노동운동을 중심으로 -
역사교육
2020 .09
-
동일방직 사건과 1970년대 여성노동자, 그리고 지식
역사비평
2015 .08
-
20세기 전반 한인의 일본 이주와 정착 : 이주 현지의 사회적 영향을 중심으로
역사학보
2011 .12
-
직권조인과 노동운동 : 현대자동차를 중심으로
울산사학
2014 .12
-
Labor Movement in Korea
Korea Journal
1964 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0