지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is aimed at analyzing a relationship of a dominant discourse and subordinate discourse at the end of the colonial era. So far, discourse of kukminmunhak(國民文學) imitated and differentiated from a dominant discourse, but this paper insist that discourse of kukminmunhak reproduced the dominant discourse. The reason is as follows.
Firstly, the subject from discourse of kukminmunhak, the subordinate subject, was without a clack. In other words, the subject of discourse was not de-constructive. The subordinate subject had a clear ambition as the imperial-subject, and realized the meaning of the Sino-Japanese War, and the Pacific War. Secondly, the discourse of kukminmunkak was estranged from the realty. In this discourse, korean imagined the subject as the role of the world of history. But Actually, korean was the object of the mobilization order for imperialistic war. The covering up the gap between discourse and reality was possible, by virtu of the imagination that the editors of kukminmunhak. They thought that korean farmer was the representation of korea.
Firstly, the subject from discourse of kukminmunhak, the subordinate subject, was without a clack. In other words, the subject of discourse was not de-constructive. The subordinate subject had a clear ambition as the imperial-subject, and realized the meaning of the Sino-Japanese War, and the Pacific War. Secondly, the discourse of kukminmunkak was estranged from the realty. In this discourse, korean imagined the subject as the role of the world of history. But Actually, korean was the object of the mobilization order for imperialistic war. The covering up the gap between discourse and reality was possible, by virtu of the imagination that the editors of kukminmunhak. They thought that korean farmer was the representation of korea.
목차
Abstract
1. 머리말
2. 틈새 없는 주체, 지배 담론의 효과
3. 현실과 괴리된 국민문학 담론
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Discourse Functions of New-this
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
만주국 시기 조선인 이민담론의 시론적 고찰 : 조선일보 사설을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
라깡의 네 가지 담론
현대정신분석
2004 .08
-
Reference in Korean Discourse
Korea Journal
1979 .02
-
담화 단위와 의미
한국어학
2017 .11
-
중국어 담화표지어 유형 및 중한 대조 연구
담화와인지
2016 .02
-
조선어학회 사건 관련 언어 민족주의 담론 분석
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
담화유형별 선호 논항 구조
담화와인지
2005 .12
-
Discourse Connection and the Choice of This or That
담화와인지
2003 .12
-
이광수 후반기 문학의 민족 담론의 양가성
어문학
2007 .09
-
Some Thoughts on Discourse markers
영어영문학
2003 .12
-
"Thank You" and "You're Welcome" in Spoken Discourse
담화와인지
1999 .12
-
한중 담화표지 대조연구 : 개념과 특징을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
담론의 균열과 지식인의 위치
우리말글
2013 .04
-
자기소개 담화에 나타난 ‘자아 표현’ 양상과 실현 맥락에 관한 고찰 : 대학생 자기소개 담화를 중심으로
국어교육연구
2009 .02
-
국어 담화표지 ‘어’의 고찰
국어문학
2006 .08
-
From Discourse to Logic : A Compositional Approach to Discourse Semantics
어학연구
1991 .03
-
Three Current Topics in Discourse
언어
1981 .06
-
English Discourse-deictic Expressions and their Discourse Connection
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2002 .12
-
한국어 담론 철학 : 분석담론의 경우
철학연구
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0