메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제69호
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
75 - 102 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Daedongdongjihoe was organised as an pro-Japanese organization which should lead the anti-Japanese movements and the ideological struggles of the Korean people and contrive the coexistence and coprosperity between the both people in Pyongyang. Many leading figures of this group like Sunwoo Soon etc. came from the core of the Enlightenment movement that had been in activity in Pyoungyang, but directly before and after the Samil Independence Movement most of all had changed their coat publicly.
The central activity of this organization was to propagate the thoughts. It devoted itself entirely not only to the educational activities, e.g. dispatching a student studying abroad and founding the educational institutions, but also to the direct propaganda activities such as the opening of the popular lecture meeting and the publication of the bulletin. And especially the bulletin 『Gongyoung』 gave emphasis to the intimate relationship of the regional and the colonial power.
In a word, the main ideology of the Daedongdongiihoe group in the 『Gongyoung』 was the coexistence and coprosperity of the strong and tile week. It meant that the strong and the week should be the Japanese people and tile Korean people on the perspective of the nationalism, and the capitalists and tile workers on the perspective of the class theory. The former became concretized into the 'Naesunilcheron(內鮮一體論)', the latter emphasized the co-operation of the workers and the capitalists. The anti-materialism was advocated to fulfill this aim. Members of this group all criticized both of the capitalism and the socialism on the anti-materialistic position. But tile critical point and accent was very different. While their critic on the capitalism was only restricted to the management problem, they assumed the much more critical attitude toward tile socialism, so that they had denied tile socialistic system entirely.

목차

머리말
1. 대동동지회의 조직과 활동
2. 『공영』: 지역성과 식민지 권력
3. ‘공존공영’: ‘내선일체론’과 반‘유물’관
맺음말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0