지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Anumber of scholars believe that the Reformation of French right-wing party (Reformation), which underwent from 1995 to 2007, and the Counter-Manifestation of the Reformation mirror Revolution of May 1968. However, more appropriate point of view would be to say the Reformation claimed a separation from Social Party government and accomplished its own arguments and plans. This claim tried not only to destroy the values and logics of Social Party, but also to amend the value of Tolerance which left wing parties tried to preserve.
In order to show that their reform policy cannot coexist with citizen government self-governing or socialist ideology, the right-wing government seem to have tried to handle Tolerance. Although the right-wing government has not touched on sensitive religion issue of Islam yet, it is obvious that they were going to put a restriction on illegal immigrant issue, social right, and social providence. Like this, the anti-Tolerance policy of the right-wing government faced severe resistance, but the right-wing government still won the election, and a survey of public opinion did not seem too bad. Therefore, we know the fact that Parisians tried to preserve the value of Tolerance did not cause them to doubt about the governing power of the right-wing government.
Taking the current (2007-2008) political circumstances into consideration, Paris has low possibility of recovering the past status of Tolerance. This is due to the late 20th century's structural contradiction, which occurred globally. Even though the phenomenon of international migration of workers, failure of socialism, and rise of neo-democracy arose, there was no clear resistance or measure to these phenomenon. Therefore, it is too early for one to decide that Parisians will continue to maintain the value of Tolerance along with the immigrant problems and multi-cultural characteristics.
The reason why the Parisians showed confused attitude towards Tolerance was because of the rebirth of nationalism, egocentrism, racialism and others that once thought to be expelled from the French. This phenomenon occurred all over Europe with a peculiar combination of conservatism and neo-liberalism after the real socialism collapsed.
However, Paris will not give up Tolerance easily. Because, Paris has succeeded its fame and vitality as an international city through maintaining generosity and open-mindedness. Also because, Parisians already understand that the moment they give up Tolerance, Paris would lose vitality and creativity that Paris has always possessed.
We can find the possibility of Tolerance when the Parisians elected a social party mayor in 2001 and 2008 municipal elections, even though they elected the right-wing government and president. The reason why the rich Paris elected a social party mayor is because they believed that he, as the head of a municipal organization, could preserve the value of the Tolerance by maintaining environmental and residential policies, which are two new visions of international city. Besides, if the mayor was a sexual minority (he is homosexual), haven't Parisians given him the biggest Tolerance, and asked for the same from him?
In order to show that their reform policy cannot coexist with citizen government self-governing or socialist ideology, the right-wing government seem to have tried to handle Tolerance. Although the right-wing government has not touched on sensitive religion issue of Islam yet, it is obvious that they were going to put a restriction on illegal immigrant issue, social right, and social providence. Like this, the anti-Tolerance policy of the right-wing government faced severe resistance, but the right-wing government still won the election, and a survey of public opinion did not seem too bad. Therefore, we know the fact that Parisians tried to preserve the value of Tolerance did not cause them to doubt about the governing power of the right-wing government.
Taking the current (2007-2008) political circumstances into consideration, Paris has low possibility of recovering the past status of Tolerance. This is due to the late 20th century's structural contradiction, which occurred globally. Even though the phenomenon of international migration of workers, failure of socialism, and rise of neo-democracy arose, there was no clear resistance or measure to these phenomenon. Therefore, it is too early for one to decide that Parisians will continue to maintain the value of Tolerance along with the immigrant problems and multi-cultural characteristics.
The reason why the Parisians showed confused attitude towards Tolerance was because of the rebirth of nationalism, egocentrism, racialism and others that once thought to be expelled from the French. This phenomenon occurred all over Europe with a peculiar combination of conservatism and neo-liberalism after the real socialism collapsed.
However, Paris will not give up Tolerance easily. Because, Paris has succeeded its fame and vitality as an international city through maintaining generosity and open-mindedness. Also because, Parisians already understand that the moment they give up Tolerance, Paris would lose vitality and creativity that Paris has always possessed.
We can find the possibility of Tolerance when the Parisians elected a social party mayor in 2001 and 2008 municipal elections, even though they elected the right-wing government and president. The reason why the rich Paris elected a social party mayor is because they believed that he, as the head of a municipal organization, could preserve the value of the Tolerance by maintaining environmental and residential policies, which are two new visions of international city. Besides, if the mayor was a sexual minority (he is homosexual), haven't Parisians given him the biggest Tolerance, and asked for the same from him?
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 파리와 톨레랑스
Ⅲ. 신자유주의 개혁과 톨레랑스
Ⅳ. ‘톨레랑스 제로‘
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
비시정권의 여성동원
대구사학
2008 .01
-
종교적 관용이 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향 : 사회적·정치적 요인의 매개효과를 중심으로
종교연구
2016 .06
-
The Wings
Korea Journal
1983 .01
-
정치 관용 비판 : 다문화주의에서 관용의 탈정치화
철학탐구
2017 .02
-
서(恕)와 똘레랑스(tolerance)의네 가지 차이점- 서와 똘레랑스의 적절한 상보적 역할 부여를 위하여 -
시대와 철학
2020 .01
-
Wings That Will Carry Us Both
Korea Journal
1981 .02
-
Religious Tolerance and Its Philosophical Basis
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .07
-
프랑스 현대철학자들의 사상에 나타나는 똘레랑스 정신
인간연구
2016 .01
-
파리의 지적 인프라 및 지적 네트워크 -12세기와 13세기 초를 중심으로-
서양중세사연구
2008 .01
-
[Art] My Life in Paris (Ⅲ)
Korea Journal
1969 .08
-
[Art] My Life in Paris (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1969 .07
-
대학생의 자기결정성과 학업적 실패내성이영어 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
영어영문학21
2014 .01
-
대학 영어수업에서 거꾸로 학습(Flipped Learning) 적용 사례—실패내성과 선호도 중심으로
영어영문학21
2015 .01
-
새로운 관계성을 향한 관용에 대한 기독교윤리학적 이해: 웬디 브라운(Wendy Brown)의 관점을 중심으로
선교와 신학
2020 .02
-
9.11 테러와 이슬람의 포용성에 대한 고찰
종교연구
2004 .03
-
스피노자의 관용과 사랑
철학연구
2011 .06
-
스포츠에서의 관용의 윤리
철학탐구
2017 .08
-
1871년 빠리 꼬뮌정부의 이데올로기 연구
역사와 세계
1995 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0