지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On July 11th of 2007, the Korean government suggested a basic plan for the complete dematerialization system of all types of securities. The Ministry of Justice made a preliminary announcement that it would reform the Korea Commercial Act by introducing the securities materialization system, that is the electronic registration of stocks and corporate bonds.
The necessity and adequacy of the securities materialization system have been deeply analyzed in a well-researched report on September of 2006 written by Booz/Allen/Hamilton Consulting Firm of which title is "the Master Plan for the adoption of the securities materialization." Then, the report was officially submitted to the Korean Securities Depository.
Some minor issues should be solved in advance for the soft and successful landing of the securities dematerialization, including an issue that who get the power in the initial (or primary) registration of government bonds and bills between the Bank of Korea and the Korean Securities Depository.
The conflict of interest problem between both institutions should be solved following to several rationales which have been well grounded in terms of neutrality and objectivity in the securities sectors. A turf war between both institutions based on institutional selfishness should be avoided.
This paper reviews three alternative models currently available in the world. Model Ⅰ is that the central securities depository has either a primary registration power or a secondary registration power in the course of dematerialization process of government securities. Model Ⅱ is that the central securities depository has only the secondary registration power and the central bank has the initial registration power. Model Ⅲ is an absolutely opposite one to Model Ⅰ and the central bank has all the registration powers in the government securities. This paper concludes that Model Ⅰ should be a norm in the near future in terms of either an international perspective or a efficiency and scale economy aspect on a domestic level.
The necessity and adequacy of the securities materialization system have been deeply analyzed in a well-researched report on September of 2006 written by Booz/Allen/Hamilton Consulting Firm of which title is "the Master Plan for the adoption of the securities materialization." Then, the report was officially submitted to the Korean Securities Depository.
Some minor issues should be solved in advance for the soft and successful landing of the securities dematerialization, including an issue that who get the power in the initial (or primary) registration of government bonds and bills between the Bank of Korea and the Korean Securities Depository.
The conflict of interest problem between both institutions should be solved following to several rationales which have been well grounded in terms of neutrality and objectivity in the securities sectors. A turf war between both institutions based on institutional selfishness should be avoided.
This paper reviews three alternative models currently available in the world. Model Ⅰ is that the central securities depository has either a primary registration power or a secondary registration power in the course of dematerialization process of government securities. Model Ⅱ is that the central securities depository has only the secondary registration power and the central bank has the initial registration power. Model Ⅲ is an absolutely opposite one to Model Ⅰ and the central bank has all the registration powers in the government securities. This paper concludes that Model Ⅰ should be a norm in the near future in terms of either an international perspective or a efficiency and scale economy aspect on a domestic level.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 세 가지 모델
Ⅲ. 최적모델의 모색(1)
Ⅳ. 최적모델의 모색(2) : 외국제도와의 국제적인 정합성 추구 - 외국에서의 국채 및 기타 증권에 대한 등록ㆍ결제제도 개관 -
Ⅴ. 모델 Ⅰ 채택시 예상되는 문제점에 대한 검토
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김순석 / 2005 / 주식 등의 전자등록제도 도입의 필요성과 법적 검토과제 / 「상사법연구(제24권 제3호)」
2. [기타자료] - 독일재무청 홈페이지 / 2005 / http://www.deutsche-finanzagentur.de/cln_043/nn_105166/EN/FinanceAgency/AboutUs/about__us__node.html?__nnn=true, 검색일:
3. [단행본] - 박철영 / 2004 / 일본의 유가증권 불발행(paperless)제도에 관한 고찰 / ""증권예탁2004-48
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 손진화 / 2003 / 주식 등의 전자등록제도의 도입방안 / 상사법연구(제22권 제3호)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 안성포 / 2005 / 전자등록제도의 도입을 위한 입법론적 고찰 - 일본의 사채ㆍ주식등 대체법을 중심으로
2. [기타자료] - 독일재무청 홈페이지 / 2005 / http://www.deutsche-finanzagentur.de/cln_043/nn_105166/EN/FinanceAgency/AboutUs/about__us__node.html?__nnn=true, 검색일:
3. [단행본] - 박철영 / 2004 / 일본의 유가증권 불발행(paperless)제도에 관한 고찰 / ""증권예탁2004-48
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 손진화 / 2003 / 주식 등의 전자등록제도의 도입방안 / 상사법연구(제22권 제3호)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 안성포 / 2005 / 전자등록제도의 도입을 위한 입법론적 고찰 - 일본의 사채ㆍ주식등 대체법을 중심으로
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
证券“托管”与“存管”之惑 —从市场演进轨迹中看制度错谬—
경영법률
2010 .01
-
전자증권제도 도입에 따른 주요 법적 과제
고려법학
2017 .01
-
전자증권제도 시행의 주요 법적과제
외법논집
2019 .01
-
부동산등기법 개정에 관한 소고
일감법학
2011 .01
-
전자증권법제의 도입 및 향후 법적 정비 과제
증권법연구
2019 .12
-
전자증권의 담보설정과 법적 과제
법학연구
2014 .06
-
중국의 상사등기제도 개혁에 대한 고찰
중국법연구
2018 .01
-
전자증권도입에 따른 증권결제제도의 문제점과 대응방안에 대한 연구
통상정보연구
2019 .06
-
유가증권의 전자화와 그 법적 과제에 관한 연구
법학연구
2008 .05
-
讓渡擔保·假登記擔保의 새로운 법적 구성
재산법연구
2003 .01
-
株式會社 登記事項에 대한 立法論的 檢討
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
동산 및 채권 등의 담보에 관한 법률상 동산담보제도에 관한 연구 - 양도담보에 대한 영향 및 선의취득을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2011 .01
-
주민등록법상 주민등록번호 제도의 헌법적 문제점과 개선방안
法學論文集
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0