메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第22卷 第3號
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
345 - 376 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On July 11th of 2007, the Korean government suggested a basic plan for the complete dematerialization system of all types of securities. The Ministry of Justice made a preliminary announcement that it would reform the Korea Commercial Act by introducing the securities materialization system, that is the electronic registration of stocks and corporate bonds.
The necessity and adequacy of the securities materialization system have been deeply analyzed in a well-researched report on September of 2006 written by Booz/Allen/Hamilton Consulting Firm of which title is "the Master Plan for the adoption of the securities materialization." Then, the report was officially submitted to the Korean Securities Depository.
Some minor issues should be solved in advance for the soft and successful landing of the securities dematerialization, including an issue that who get the power in the initial (or primary) registration of government bonds and bills between the Bank of Korea and the Korean Securities Depository.
The conflict of interest problem between both institutions should be solved following to several rationales which have been well grounded in terms of neutrality and objectivity in the securities sectors. A turf war between both institutions based on institutional selfishness should be avoided.
This paper reviews three alternative models currently available in the world. Model Ⅰ is that the central securities depository has either a primary registration power or a secondary registration power in the course of dematerialization process of government securities. Model Ⅱ is that the central securities depository has only the secondary registration power and the central bank has the initial registration power. Model Ⅲ is an absolutely opposite one to Model Ⅰ and the central bank has all the registration powers in the government securities. This paper concludes that Model Ⅰ should be a norm in the near future in terms of either an international perspective or a efficiency and scale economy aspect on a domestic level.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 세 가지 모델
Ⅲ. 최적모델의 모색(1)
Ⅳ. 최적모델의 모색(2) : 외국제도와의 국제적인 정합성 추구 - 외국에서의 국채 및 기타 증권에 대한 등록ㆍ결제제도 개관 -
Ⅴ. 모델 Ⅰ 채택시 예상되는 문제점에 대한 검토
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0