지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to account for Chomsky's (2001) idiosyncratic analysis of A' -movement in presentational there-constructions by using the proposals made by Chomsky (2005). In Chomsky's (2001) analysis where the A' -movement of already extracted/thematized phrase is impossible in these constructions, he proposed that the continuous A' -movement of this phrase be restricted because of the violation of application-order between syntactic and phonological operations. In other words, a wh-phrase cannot continue to perform the syntactic A' -movement operation after a phonological Th/Ex-rule was applied to this phrase.
Therefore, reviewing various analyses of authors, we not only adopt the new definition of A/A'-chain and the concept of Edge Feature/(Agree) and Feature Inheritance proposed by Chomsky (2005), but also eliminate this phonological rule from the derivation of these constructions.
In consequence, I verify that the feature-valuation of a copy in spec-TP distinguishes, in an effective manner, between adequacy and inadequacy of A' -movement in presentational there-constructions. This analytic result will allow us to suggest that the phonological Th/Ex, which was designed only for these constructions in Chomsky (2001), be completely redundant rule.
Therefore, reviewing various analyses of authors, we not only adopt the new definition of A/A'-chain and the concept of Edge Feature/(Agree) and Feature Inheritance proposed by Chomsky (2005), but also eliminate this phonological rule from the derivation of these constructions.
In consequence, I verify that the feature-valuation of a copy in spec-TP distinguishes, in an effective manner, between adequacy and inadequacy of A' -movement in presentational there-constructions. This analytic result will allow us to suggest that the phonological Th/Ex, which was designed only for these constructions in Chomsky (2001), be completely redundant rule.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 구조적인 분석의 차이: there BE vs. there Ⅴ
Ⅲ. 의문사구-이동과 A‘/A-연쇄
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Chomsky의 언어 이론
국제언어문학
2004 .12
-
On Object Dislocation
언어과학연구
2004 .12
-
Some Notes on there-Constructions
언어과학
2016 .01
-
A Principled Explanation on the Quantifier Scope Phenomena
언어과학연구
2018 .12
-
A Minimalist Approach to English Passive Morpheme -en
새한영어영문학
2010 .05
-
Syntactic Focus Movement and Presentational there Constructions
생성문법연구
2003 .01
-
Chomsky의 “언어”와 “문법”
신영어영문학회 학술발표회 자료집
2000 .01
-
허사 there 구문에 대하여
언어과학
2004 .01
-
동사이동과 최소주의
언어과학
2011 .01
-
A Syntactic Analysis of Th/Ex-Constructions and Some Results
새한영어영문학
2004 .03
-
A Syntactic Approach to Passive Existential Constructions
신영어영문학
2010 .11
-
The Movement Order of the VP-Subject and the VP-Object in English
영어학
2004 .03
-
수동허사구문의 병합
신영어영문학
2012 .11
-
The Expletive 'there' Construction and Its Kin in Word Order Variation
영어영문학연구
2004 .01
-
한국어 교재에서 음운 규칙의 학습 순서와 텍스트의 대응 관계 분석
한국어학
2018 .05
-
A Note on Expletive Split
생성문법연구
2002 .01
-
Fries와 Chomsky
어학연구
1967 .12
-
‘Chomsky’의 생성문법 이론에 관한 일반적 개관
동서문화
2001 .12
-
On Chomsky-Adjunction
어학연구
1974 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0