메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 19호
발행연도
2002.8
수록면
247 - 265 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay tries to reconstruct the basic logical structure of semiology in the context of searching for an overarching paradigm of understanding films. Apart from the ongoing debates how far it can persuade to read a film 'objectively' in terms of the codes, as we retrospect to the history of film theory up to now, we then can find out the traces of logical continuity and abrupt discontinuity between the classical paradigms such as realism and formalism and the modem ones such as auteurism, semiology, genre theory and psychoanalysis.
The modernity of semiology in comparison with classical film theories lies in the denial of an uncritical projection of non-cinematic ideas on cinema and the arising consciousness of cinema as an autonomous human and social culture. But the immanent logical problems of semiology lead to the increasing tendency of the methodic relativism for which modern genre theory and psychoanalysis are representative, This dramatic turnover in general comes from the total 'decline of modern subjectivity'.
However, it would be an overevaluation of psychoanalytic film theory if one has come to the conclusion that the semiological debate had ultimately been overturned by the psychoanalytic one. The very subtile mechanism of modern film theory allows no such a reductive argumentation. For psychoanalytic film theory under the great influence of Lacan and post-structuralism has failed at last to prove the absolute irrational being of the human psyche. On the contrary, modern film theories are now faced with the universal relativism of paradigm of understanding films; moreover, classical film theories have begun to look overcoming the hard attack of psychoanalytic position.
Semiology is as an overarching cinematic paradigm now obsolete, but remains as a methodological tool for analyzing cinematic text "modern" because it is very sensitive to the spatio-temporal boundedness of film culture. Here lies the modernity of semiology itself.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 방법론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 현대 영화 미학의 효시로서의 기호학
Ⅳ. 영화 기호학에 내재된 방법론적 문제점
Ⅴ. 정신 분석학적 문제제기
Ⅵ. 정신 분석학적 영화이론에 내재된 방법론적 문제점
Ⅶ. 나오는 말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0