지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals with municipal socialism in early twentieth-century Britain. The historical concept of ‘municipal socialism’ is re-examined from a linguistic perspective. The focus will be put on how the influence of socialism on local politics was understood by political commentators, rather than on what kind of activities local socialist organizations actually pursued.
Most research on municipal socialism focuses on how socialist bodies organised their branches at local level and how their demands were accepted or rejected by local authorities. For example, Sue Lawrence reviews historical research on the relationship between socialist organizations and municipal authorities from the 1880s to the 1910s. Most of them deal with how some public utilities and services were municipalized in this period. However, they do not provide a satisfactory answer to the question of why such a municipalization came to be understood as a special kind of ‘Socialism’. Indeed Lawrence points out, on another occasion, that municipal socialism was more influenced by the utilitarianism of the 1830s than by socialism on a theoretical level and thus that the term ‘municipal socialism’ is not completely appropriate to indicate this event. Nevertheless, she does not explain how the term ‘Socialism’ came to be applied to such activities.
This article suggests that such a question can be solved by looking at how this term was understood and developed by political commentators. For this task, it analyzes a series of articles on 'municipal socialism in The Times and other conservative political publications. It will be revealed that The Times played the leading role in spreading the idea that municipalities in many regions were under the influence of ‘Socialism’. They encouraged the use of the term ‘municipal socialism’ to criticize the increasingly radical social policies of the Liberal Party, while providing little evidence of a clear relationship between the socialist organizations and the local authorities.
Most research on municipal socialism focuses on how socialist bodies organised their branches at local level and how their demands were accepted or rejected by local authorities. For example, Sue Lawrence reviews historical research on the relationship between socialist organizations and municipal authorities from the 1880s to the 1910s. Most of them deal with how some public utilities and services were municipalized in this period. However, they do not provide a satisfactory answer to the question of why such a municipalization came to be understood as a special kind of ‘Socialism’. Indeed Lawrence points out, on another occasion, that municipal socialism was more influenced by the utilitarianism of the 1830s than by socialism on a theoretical level and thus that the term ‘municipal socialism’ is not completely appropriate to indicate this event. Nevertheless, she does not explain how the term ‘Socialism’ came to be applied to such activities.
This article suggests that such a question can be solved by looking at how this term was understood and developed by political commentators. For this task, it analyzes a series of articles on 'municipal socialism in The Times and other conservative political publications. It will be revealed that The Times played the leading role in spreading the idea that municipalities in many regions were under the influence of ‘Socialism’. They encouraged the use of the term ‘municipal socialism’ to criticize the increasingly radical social policies of the Liberal Party, while providing little evidence of a clear relationship between the socialist organizations and the local authorities.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ.《타임즈》의 ‘자치도시 사회주의’
Ⅲ. 자치도시 사회주의의 실체
Ⅳ. 다른 언론매체들의 반응
Ⅴ. 사회주의의 확산 또는 후퇴?
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cosby, D.S.A / 1903 / Liberalism in Chaos / Westminster Review 160 : 375 ~ 380
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Godard, J.G / 1902 / The Liberal Debacle / Westminster Review 158 : 597 ~ 620
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Good, J / 1902 / A Defence of Trade Unions / Westminster Review 158
4. [기타자료] - Say, M.L / 1886 / “Say (M. Leon) on Municipal Socialism, at the Liberty and Property Defence League,” The Times (1 July 1886), 8, col. a
5. [기타자료] - / 1903 / “Correction,” The Times (23 March 1903), 6, col. d
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Godard, J.G / 1902 / The Liberal Debacle / Westminster Review 158 : 597 ~ 620
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Good, J / 1902 / A Defence of Trade Unions / Westminster Review 158
4. [기타자료] - Say, M.L / 1886 / “Say (M. Leon) on Municipal Socialism, at the Liberty and Property Defence League,” The Times (1 July 1886), 8, col. a
5. [기타자료] - / 1903 / “Correction,” The Times (23 March 1903), 6, col. d
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영국 에드워드 시대의 보수언론과 ‘사회주의’ 담론의 형성
영국 연구
2004 .01
-
자본주의와 사회주의, 그 이후
인문학연구
2009 .02
-
1920-30년대 불교계의 사회주의에 대한 인식
대각사상
2012 .01
-
대안적 기획과 사회주의론
한신논문집
1997 .10
-
영국의 점진적 사회주의 발생의 사회적 배경
역사학보
1994 .09
-
民國初 中國社會黨의 정치사상 -世界社會主義·國家社會主義·無政府主義 파벌을 중심으로 -
역사와경계
2003 .12
-
강유위의 대동사상의 사상적 함의와 중국적 사회주의의 현대화의 연관성
중국학
2017 .01
-
러시아 정치적 상황과 사회주의의 전망
슬라브학보
1997 .06
-
진보적 지방정치의 역사적 경험들- 시기별 특징과 그 함의
도시인문학연구
2014 .01
-
경제 민주화 담론의 몰락과 노동자 정치 언어의 파국 : 1960년대 민주사회주의 담론의 정치적 의미
코기토
2016 .02
-
1920년대 초반 “사회주의”의 등장과 “행복” 담론의 변화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2011 .03
-
독일어권의 종교사회주의에 대한 연구
기독교사회윤리
2008 .01
-
「행복한 왕자 외」와 「석류나무 집」: 와일드의 기독교 사회주의
근대영미소설
2011 .01
-
조지 오웰의 사회주의 : 토리 무정부주의와 민주적 사회주의
역사와경계
2016 .09
-
산업민주주의의 실현과 사회주의로 가는 길, 김명환, 『영국 사회주의의 두 갈래 길』 (한울, 2006), 387쪽
역사와경계
2008 .09
-
Britain and Korea : 1883-1983
Korea Journal
1984 .04
-
한국에서 사회주의와 근대의 의미 : 하나의 해석
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
1920년대 경북 북부지역 유학적 지식인들의 사회주의운동과 성격
국학연구
2004 .06
-
1990년대 전향 담론의 성격과 한계
한국학논집
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014647077