지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are pairs of verbal expressions which can be generalized in the following way: [verb＋object] and [verb＋preposition＋object]. In the first expression, the verb is immediately followed by the object, whereas in the second expression, the verb is followed by a preposition, which in tum is followed by the object. These patterns are very productive as can be seen in the following representative examples:
(1) a. He caught the straw. b. He caught at the straw.
(2) a. They fought us. b. They fought with us.
In the traditional grammar, the semantic difference between the two expressions were not seriously studied and even in the pedagogical grammars, the difference is simply ignored. The purpose of this paper is to hypothesize that the formal difference (the absence or presence of the preposition) carries clear semantic consequence: the effect of the form is to indicate the impact of the action denoted by the verb. When the object immediately follows the verb, it is directly and totally affected, whereas when the object follows the preposition, it is indirectly and partially affected by the action denoted by the verb. The present paper supports Lakoff's following metaphor: The closer the form indicating causation is to the form indicating the effect, the stronger the causal link is.
(1) a. He caught the straw. b. He caught at the straw.
(2) a. They fought us. b. They fought with us.
In the traditional grammar, the semantic difference between the two expressions were not seriously studied and even in the pedagogical grammars, the difference is simply ignored. The purpose of this paper is to hypothesize that the formal difference (the absence or presence of the preposition) carries clear semantic consequence: the effect of the form is to indicate the impact of the action denoted by the verb. When the object immediately follows the verb, it is directly and totally affected, whereas when the object follows the preposition, it is indirectly and partially affected by the action denoted by the verb. The present paper supports Lakoff's following metaphor: The closer the form indicating causation is to the form indicating the effect, the stronger the causal link is.
목차
1. Problem
2. Previous Studies
3. Iconicity and the general meaning of VPC
4. An analysis of [verb＋at＋object]
5. A Cognitive Analysis: Integration and composition
6. Concluding remarks
References
Dictionaries
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
現代漢語"動賓式動詞+賓語"現象的硏究
언어과학연구
2008 .09
-
“動詞+在”結構新論
중어중문학
2014 .12
-
Reanalysis of Verb and Preposition in English
어학연구
2003 .12
-
일부 동사의 전치사 유무에 따른 의미 차이
영어영문학
2011 .10
-
“雙音節V+N”定中結構研究
중국어교육과연구
2013 .12
-
LIGHT VERBS AND VERB RAISING
어학연구
1988 .12
-
영어 중간태 동사 구문 : 영어 심리 동사를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2015 .04
-
『현대 한국어 동사 구문사전』 거시구조 기술의 문제
언어학
2016 .12
-
현대영어동사 변화의 통시적 관찰
새한영어영문학
2003 .11
-
國語 補助動詞의 統辭的 特性 硏究
어문론집
2001 .12
-
영어 다어 동사 교수의 문제와 제안
영어학
2008 .06
-
독일어 동사의 조어 유형
언어과학연구
2013 .03
-
유형론적 관점에서 본 영어와 중국어의 경로 표현의 실현 문제에 관한 연구- 이동 사건 표현 움직임동사 구문을 중심으로
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
이중목적어 동사의 분포
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
사슬동사의 하위범주와 아원자적 의미기술
언어과학
2005 .01
-
중국어 상태심리동사의 범위
언어학 연구
2016 .07
-
基于数据库的现代汉语动量词与动词组合的再考
중국어문논총
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-016224676