개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is patent that human cloning ought not to proceed to the clinical research stage. A short teem moratorium on clinical trials of human cloning is clearly warranted on safety grounds alone, because as noted elsewhere there is no obvious pathway from animal to human research that does not involve significant risks to human subjects. As we have noted elsewhere, it is doubtful even in the long term that any individual or couple will present a rationale for the use of such technologies that is compelling enough to warrant the incumbent risks. It is also quite clear that any restrictions on research involving human cloning should be crafted carefully so as to ensure that scientific research in infertility medicine, including research on embryos, not be stifled by doctrinaire attacks on scientific freedom.
In addition to technological distinctions between clones and babies of more ordinary, there would obviously be important distinctions between the social and parental roles of those who 'make' clones, and those who parent other babies. 'Strictly' speaking, it was argued early in the debate, the female donor of DNA to a clone(who gives that clone her chromosomes) is not the mother but a twin, and the father but brother-in-law. this has bearing not only on the social but also legal meanings of parenthood. e.g. would the clone inherit from the father or the grandfather?
The worldwide legislative hyperventilation and U.S. Presidential declarations on human cloning followed in the weeks after Dolly's birth. The President funded a national bioethics commission to discuss cloning, which issued a fairly predictable call for a temporary ban on human cloning. Legislation to ban cloning was tabled in the House after some discussion. It began to seem that cloning was an issue that could wait, since human cloning was so much more complex than sheep cloning.
This paper has a aim of introduction of American Constitutional pro-con debate on human cloning in review of related articles on them.
In addition to technological distinctions between clones and babies of more ordinary, there would obviously be important distinctions between the social and parental roles of those who 'make' clones, and those who parent other babies. 'Strictly' speaking, it was argued early in the debate, the female donor of DNA to a clone(who gives that clone her chromosomes) is not the mother but a twin, and the father but brother-in-law. this has bearing not only on the social but also legal meanings of parenthood. e.g. would the clone inherit from the father or the grandfather?
The worldwide legislative hyperventilation and U.S. Presidential declarations on human cloning followed in the weeks after Dolly's birth. The President funded a national bioethics commission to discuss cloning, which issued a fairly predictable call for a temporary ban on human cloning. Legislation to ban cloning was tabled in the House after some discussion. It began to seem that cloning was an issue that could wait, since human cloning was so much more complex than sheep cloning.
This paper has a aim of introduction of American Constitutional pro-con debate on human cloning in review of related articles on them.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 금지합헌론과 금지위헌론
Ⅲ. 연방최고법원과 생식의 권리
Ⅳ. Robertson의 생식의 權利論
Ⅴ. Human Cloning의 기본적 권리성
Ⅵ. 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
人間複製技術의 發展과 法的 問題點
한림법학 FORUM
2001 .11
-
인간배아복제 연구에 관한 헌법학적 고찰
法學論文集
2014 .01
-
Human Cloning에 관한 영국의 법적 관점
공법학연구
2005 .02
-
생명공학적 특허의 법제에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2004 .03
-
인간배아복제의 정당성에 관한 법적 쟁점
법학연구
2014 .05
-
複製人間의 法的 地位
비교사법
2001 .12
-
生命倫理法에 관한 연구 - 遺傳情報保護를 중심으로
비교법학연구
2004 .09
-
기술규제체제의 국제비교 : 생명복제기술의 사례
경제와사회
2005 .06
-
태아의 법적 지위
비교사법
2003 .06
-
생명권의 헌법상 제한원리
法學論文集
2006 .01
-
인간의 자유와 과학, 그리고 생명의 윤리 경영
사회이론
2003 .12
-
인간배아연구에 따른 한국 종교의 생명윤리의 태동과 그 사회학적 비교
환경사회학연구 ECO
2006 .06
-
배아연구와 인간의 존엄과 가치 - 헌재 2010.5.27. 선고, 2005헌마346 전원재판부 결정에 대한 검토 -
원광법학
2011 .01
-
영국의 배아관리체계와 공공정책의 선택
보건행정학회지
2004 .01
-
생명복제에 관한 과학 글쓰기에 나타난 대학생들의 비판적 사고 분석
생물교육
2013 .01
-
유럽연합에서의 생명공학 발명의 법적 보호
한양법학
2013 .11
-
인권사상의 현대적 전개
법학연구
2005 .12
-
생명윤리 및 안전을 위한 법제정 방향
법학논집
2001 .01
-
위험소통을 통한 신뢰가 위험인식에 미치는 효과 - 유전자조작기술, 나노기술, 체세포복제기술에 대한 전문가그룹 인식조사를 중심으로 -
Crisisonomy
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016081894