지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Critical historians insist that the purpose of German Naval Policy was an irrational attack against Britain as a foreign policy, and domestically to collect power against parliamentary democracy. And the latter was more important than diplomatic or military reasons considering the fact that the policy was established based on the theory of social historians, ‘Primat der Innenpolitik', to protest social and parliamentary democracy. However, foreign policy they pursued that time was a Weltpolitik which has its own originality.
After intervening the post Sino-Japanese War as the Triple Intervention in 1895, they were ready for a take-off to be a world power, not only a great power in Europe, to hop here and there to intervene in dispute or trouble over the world. To realize this plan the naval policy to raise powerful naval forces was essential.
After Tirpitz became the secretary of the Navy Department in 1897, there was a big controversy whether they should focus more on building cruisers than on ships-of-the-line or vice-versa. They dreaded the blockade of their home waters by British Navy, and hence accepted Tirpitz' policy that they had to concentrate on home fleet first, and later move on to overseas fleet.
Social historian like Berghahn insisted that this was an offensive gesture against England. This was, however, rather a defensive one to prevent Britain from blockading home waters. In short, German Naval Policy has both defensive and offensive sides, but defence was preferred over offence. Final goal for their naval policy was to threaten British Navy, after they become strong enough not to worry about British Navy closing their near sea.
Seizing the opportunity of the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, they dispatched a naval division made up of ships-of-the-line to Northeast Asia as a part of Weltpolitik. This harvested some fruit in October 1900, from the Yangtze Agreement with England. However, they decided to evacuate the division in Asia in 1901, because they still needed to defend their northern sea in case of dispute with England. This shows that German Weltpolitik was inconsistentand contradictory.
After intervening the post Sino-Japanese War as the Triple Intervention in 1895, they were ready for a take-off to be a world power, not only a great power in Europe, to hop here and there to intervene in dispute or trouble over the world. To realize this plan the naval policy to raise powerful naval forces was essential.
After Tirpitz became the secretary of the Navy Department in 1897, there was a big controversy whether they should focus more on building cruisers than on ships-of-the-line or vice-versa. They dreaded the blockade of their home waters by British Navy, and hence accepted Tirpitz' policy that they had to concentrate on home fleet first, and later move on to overseas fleet.
Social historian like Berghahn insisted that this was an offensive gesture against England. This was, however, rather a defensive one to prevent Britain from blockading home waters. In short, German Naval Policy has both defensive and offensive sides, but defence was preferred over offence. Final goal for their naval policy was to threaten British Navy, after they become strong enough not to worry about British Navy closing their near sea.
Seizing the opportunity of the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, they dispatched a naval division made up of ships-of-the-line to Northeast Asia as a part of Weltpolitik. This harvested some fruit in October 1900, from the Yangtze Agreement with England. However, they decided to evacuate the division in Asia in 1901, because they still needed to defend their northern sea in case of dispute with England. This shows that German Weltpolitik was inconsistentand contradictory.
목차
1. 서론
2. 독일 함대정책에 대한 논의구조
3. 티르피츠 계획
4. 독일 본국함대의 동아시아 파견과 철수
5. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
독일해군의 교주만膠州灣 조차와 건함사업(함대법과 건함경쟁을 중심으로)
韓國史學史學報
2018 .01
-
19세기 증기선의 도입과 영국 해군의 변화―해외 해군 기지 변화를 중심으로―
영국 연구
2013 .01
-
水師에서 海軍으로 : 청말 양무운동 시기 함선과 대포의 해외구매를 중심으로
중국근현대사연구
2012 .12
-
Colombian Navy and its contribution to the United Nations Forces in the Korean War(1951∼1955)
해항도시문화교섭학
2020 .10
-
16世紀 末葉 韓, 中, 日, 유럽 船舶의 比較
한국민족문화
2001 .09
-
Pedagogical Implications of Naval Officers` Needs for Developing Communicative English Programs for Naval Purposes
응용언어학
2016 .03
-
독일제국과 바다- 독일의 동아시아 해양정책과 식민지 건설계획을 중심으로 -
대구사학
2008 .01
-
태봉의 수군전략과 수군운용
역사와경계
2010 .06
-
淸末 水師學堂의 근대 해군 교육
역사교육
1997 .03
-
대한민국 ‘해군표지’의 변천사
한국민족문화
2018 .05
-
Admirals in the First City of the Empire ―Navy, Culture and Politics in Pre-Radical Westminster―
영국 연구
2008 .01
-
제국일본의 송진포 해군기지 건설 : 국제관계와 지역사회의 변동을 중심으로
일어일문학
2014 .05
-
1880년대 北洋水師와 朝淸關係
동양사학연구
2013 .09
-
朝ㆍ明 聯合艦隊의 형성과 露梁海戰 경과
역사학보
2003 .06
-
임진왜란 시기 李舜臣 幕下人物의 활동
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
독일 제국주의와 교주만 점령 1897/98년
역사학보
2007 .06
-
제인 오스틴의 『설득』다시 읽기
영어영문학
2010 .10
-
경제 정책으로서의 정보 정책
성곡논총
1999 .08
-
북한 해군의 6.25전쟁 준비와 초기 전투
군사연구
2019 .01
-
17세기 朝鮮 水軍操鍊의 特性
역사민속학
2014 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015894624