지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The above presentation is an examination of the satire in Can shu, which is a collection of satirical short stories written by Luo Yin. Luo Yin was interested in politics so much so that he sat the public service examination(Ke ju) 10 times, which were used as a means of finding and recruiting new talent for positions as high-ranking government officials. His interest in and frustration with politics may have motivated him to create Xiao Pin Wen which satirized the political confusion and corruption which occurred during the last days of the Tang Dynasty. The following is a brief description of the characteristics and nature of Xiao Pin Wen, obtained through an analysis of Can shu. The most important question is whether the stories in Can shu were poignant enough for it to be a work that expresses the resistance and fury that the era witnessed, as Lu Xun once noted.
Luo Yin’s works in Can shu contain sharp and clever references to those times, however, the language and expressions used in his works seem to be more subtle and gentle when compared with the works of Pi Ri Xiu and Liu Zong Yuan who were both considered to be masters of satirical literature during the Chinese Tang era. Another characteristic of Luo Yin’s works is that many of them were based on actual history. Luo Yin wrote a lot of Yong shi shi(詠史詩)for poetic and lyrical composition which showed his knowledge and insight of history, because history would have been the best tool for examining the troubled times and foreseeing the future.
As there were many strict historical restrictions, the old mores were frequently quoted, which makes it harder for today’s scholars to understand the exact meaning of the text. In his works Luo Yin also expressed his beliefs which were a completely new way of thinking from the traditional viewpoints of Confucianism, and he demonstrated innovative ideas and flexible thinking. However, the fact that his interests only lay with the ruling class and the upper class, as revealed in an analysis of his works, was one of his limitations. Regardless of the themes, the story lines of Luo Yin’s works were limited to the ruling class, which exposed his limitations with respect to his views of the social and class system.
The above is my brief interpretation and analysis of the characteristics and nature of Luo Yin’s Can shu. This analysis, however, is more of an outline which has been produced in the circumstances that the research related to this subject has not yet been completed, and therefore more expert and in-depth research on this subject is required for future reference.
Luo Yin’s works in Can shu contain sharp and clever references to those times, however, the language and expressions used in his works seem to be more subtle and gentle when compared with the works of Pi Ri Xiu and Liu Zong Yuan who were both considered to be masters of satirical literature during the Chinese Tang era. Another characteristic of Luo Yin’s works is that many of them were based on actual history. Luo Yin wrote a lot of Yong shi shi(詠史詩)for poetic and lyrical composition which showed his knowledge and insight of history, because history would have been the best tool for examining the troubled times and foreseeing the future.
As there were many strict historical restrictions, the old mores were frequently quoted, which makes it harder for today’s scholars to understand the exact meaning of the text. In his works Luo Yin also expressed his beliefs which were a completely new way of thinking from the traditional viewpoints of Confucianism, and he demonstrated innovative ideas and flexible thinking. However, the fact that his interests only lay with the ruling class and the upper class, as revealed in an analysis of his works, was one of his limitations. Regardless of the themes, the story lines of Luo Yin’s works were limited to the ruling class, which exposed his limitations with respect to his views of the social and class system.
The above is my brief interpretation and analysis of the characteristics and nature of Luo Yin’s Can shu. This analysis, however, is more of an outline which has been produced in the circumstances that the research related to this subject has not yet been completed, and therefore more expert and in-depth research on this subject is required for future reference.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 本論
Ⅲ. 結論
【參考文獻】
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
淸朝畵家羅聘與朝鮮文人朴齊家交遊考
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
『구수략(九數略)』, 송대 도서상수학으로 짜인 조선수학서 : 인문학적 지평에서
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017 .03
-
遠求近取，旁搜曲證 ― 從《六書索隱》論明人楊慎的文字學研究
중국학
2016 .01
-
秦․漢時代의 ‘庶人’ 再論
중국사연구
2012 .01
-
魏晋唐宋时期“朝隐”思想的演变
중국문화연구
2020 .05
-
≪宋書≫의 인물묘사 기교와 방법－<本紀>와 <列傳>을 중심으로－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
百余年来崔述研究述评
동아인문학
2012 .12
-
주자학 음양론과 통일교 사상 비교연구
종교연구
2014 .03
-
自我與他者的呈現 : 隱地《詩歌舖》中主體際性敘述之研究
중어중문학
2011 .04
-
정지용의 시 「鄕愁」와 陰의 상상력
한국시학연구
2007 .08
-
金履祥『濂洛風雅』在宋儒選本上的定位
중국학
2016 .01
-
萬曆연간 海澄縣 상선 징세와 그 배경
동양사학연구
2019 .12
-
2~3세기 巴蜀 지역의 史學과 士人의 이주
韓國史學史學報
2012 .01
-
陳暘 『樂書』 禮樂論의 易理的 硏究
한국사상과 문화
2011 .01
-
孔子忠恕思想考論
동서사상
2009 .02
-
沙溪 金長生의 <상서> 해석 -<經書辨疑-書傳>을 중심으로－
태동고전연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-001-016861847