메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 湖西史學 第46輯
발행연도
2007.4
수록면
127 - 157 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
From reading Louis-Sebastien Mercier's works, we find that his notions of the censorship of his time are very similar to those that the scholarship has developed for the last fifty years. This article aims to analyse Mercier's works based on the notions of censorship: preventive and constituent censorship. We suggest that Mercier was a very unique one of his time, because he had not only criticised the preventive censorship of Ancien Regime for hindering him from freely expressing and publishing his thoughts, but also proposed as an alternative the adoption of constituent censorship, which is governed by the public opinion. But it is anachronistic to think him as one of our contemporary because of his notion of constituent censorship: even in his work on utopian thoughts, L'An 2440, he did not go beyond the boundary of the kingdom, nor reached the threshold of the industrial society. We might conclude that Mercier was very regretful to see the preventive censorship hinder an ideal civil society from growing in which every citizen freely writes his experience and exchange his thoughts with others. We also figure out that he had always dreamed a society like a republic of letters, which can exist if every citizen uses his ability of constituent censorship to judge the every aspect of life, and in this respect, we appreciate his originality.

목차

Ⅰ. 검열제도 연구의 변화
Ⅱ. 메르시에가 본 규제적 검열제도
Ⅲ. 검열제도와 문학공화국의 관계
Ⅳ. 규제적 검열제도의 역기능을 순기능으로
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016649946