지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article, is the social status of certain Joseon personnel who served as County governors(Gunsu figures) in local regions, who were also high-ranking officials and social elites during the Japanese occupation period. Also examined is their own perception of the realities which surrounded them. The administrative status of the Gun units was significantly lowered during the Japanese occupation period, and the authorities of the county governors were weakened as well. Yet the county governors transformed themselves from traditional figures who merely oversaw local ruling into elitist officials who were fairly modernized. And they re-defined themselves as members of theruling class in local regions once again. Since the 1920s, the country governors had proved themselves as qualified personnel in terms of education, certification (through examinations), and career history. By doing so, they matched up to all the modern standards that were required in appointing governmental officials. They established themselves as social elites, with support of the ruling authorities.
Even under colonial ruling, the Joseon people, who were the ones that were being ruled, were in many or most cases appointed to the county governor seats. This led to a series of incidents in which low-ranking Japanese subordinates counteracted or disobeyed the orders of their Joseon superiors. Yet the county governor seat was the highest position a Joseon elite can get in a colonized situation. And the person who sought and finally took such seat, would also be tagged with the name of being a collaborator, or even being a proxy used in the suppressors’ colonial ruling.
Surely the Joseon county governors of this period recognized them as Joseon people who were being ruled by the Japanese, but they also regarded them as successful people who were part of a league that was well above the ordinary people. They pursued social advances, aimed for stability, and tried to distinguish themselves from the low-class citizens. They were part of the modern middle class, and justified their actions and objectives with their own reasoning which apparently did not put too much emphasis upon nationality. And they also supported the concept of modernization.
These bureaucratic officials’ perception of the general population, was a mix of Confucian love(愛民) for the public which the traditional Yangban officials had displayed, and the sentiment of being public servants in hopes of providing public services. They wanted to be respected as local ‘elders’, and decorated themselves with empty formalities and vanity. More often than not, the result of such exercises was either economic bankruptcy or dismissal from the office for conducts unbecoming of an official.
Even under colonial ruling, the Joseon people, who were the ones that were being ruled, were in many or most cases appointed to the county governor seats. This led to a series of incidents in which low-ranking Japanese subordinates counteracted or disobeyed the orders of their Joseon superiors. Yet the county governor seat was the highest position a Joseon elite can get in a colonized situation. And the person who sought and finally took such seat, would also be tagged with the name of being a collaborator, or even being a proxy used in the suppressors’ colonial ruling.
Surely the Joseon county governors of this period recognized them as Joseon people who were being ruled by the Japanese, but they also regarded them as successful people who were part of a league that was well above the ordinary people. They pursued social advances, aimed for stability, and tried to distinguish themselves from the low-class citizens. They were part of the modern middle class, and justified their actions and objectives with their own reasoning which apparently did not put too much emphasis upon nationality. And they also supported the concept of modernization.
These bureaucratic officials’ perception of the general population, was a mix of Confucian love(愛民) for the public which the traditional Yangban officials had displayed, and the sentiment of being public servants in hopes of providing public services. They wanted to be respected as local ‘elders’, and decorated themselves with empty formalities and vanity. More often than not, the result of such exercises was either economic bankruptcy or dismissal from the office for conducts unbecoming of an official.
목차
머리말
1. 조선인 군수의 사회적 위상과 역할
2. 조선인 군수의 현실 인식과 활동
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제하 조선인 고등관료의 형성과 정체성 : 고등문관시험 행정과 합격자를 중심으로
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
18세기 수령과 관찰사의 행정마찰과 처리방식 - ＂嘉林報草＂를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
여말선초 군현 간 합병ㆍ통합과 신읍치(新邑治)의 입지 경향
역사와현실
2011 .06
-
조선전기 守令制의 실태와 심언광의 守令觀
인문과학연구
2014 .03
-
전시체제기 조선총독부의 유림정책
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
조선후기 부세의 운영과 감사의 역할
역사와현실
2011 .09
-
조선후기 수령의 업무 능력과 부세 수취의 자율권 : 조선후기 暗行御史 書啓를 중심으로
역사와 담론
2013 .07
-
임란기 西坰 柳根의 仕宦과 지방관활동
한국인물사연구
2011 .03
-
일제시기 조선금융조합연합회의 운영주체와 ‘금융조합주의’
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
[논문]1920년대 후반~1930년대 전반기 조선총독부의 면 재정 정비과정과 그 의미
역사와현실
2005 .06
-
[한국사] GIS 기법의 활용을 통한 조선후기 越境地의 복원
역사학보
2014 .12
-
車相瓚의 지방사정조사와 조선문화인식 : ‘朝鮮文化의 基本調査’를 중심으로
역사교육
2018 .12
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
조선총독부하 일본인관료 연구
동방학지
2007 .01
-
고려시대 地方刑政과 牧
대구사학
2004 .01
-
조선총독부 고적조사사업에 대한 평가와 인식 -패전 후 일본 학계의 동향을 중심으로-
한일관계사연구
2020 .05
-
환웅, 삼조선과 부여ㆍ고구려ㆍ요ㆍ금ㆍ원ㆍ청의 계보 : 지식형태사에 입각한 한국과 방계의 역사
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
삼국통일 후 신라의 지방 제도, 얼마나 달라졌나?
역사비평
2019 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
국가의 역사독점과 민중기억의 유실 : ‘우금티 도회(都會)’를 제안한다
지수걸
역사비평
2015
.02
지방지(地方誌) 쓰기와 공동체 문화 만들기 : 『한국 근대의 역사민족지 경북 상주의 식민지 경험』 이타가키 류타 지음/홍종욱·이대화 옮김/혜안/2015
지수걸
황해문화
2015
.12
1920~30년대 전반기 식민지 조선의 농가경제 분석
이송순
사학연구
2015
.09
꺾이고 접힌 식민농정 : 『식민권력과 한국 농업―일제 식민농정의 동역학』 (정연태, 서울대학교출판문화원, 2014)
안승택
역사비평
2014
.11
1910년대 식민지 조선의 농가경제 분석
이송순
사학연구
2011
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016563158