지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently some topics relating to the diplomatic policies of the U.S.A. attracted the readers of the newspapers. One of them compared the ancient Roman imperialism with the American policies. This comparison may attribute to the anticipation of the future in the world politics. But details of the ancient Roman state hinders the comprehension. When Rome expanded her power beyond the Italian peninsula, the Romans had neither imperial ideology nor administration of the overseas territory. And the republican constitution was not in accord with the imperial image. Only before 30 years, the expression as the imperial republic has been applied to the textbooks of Roman History.
I find the educational and heuristic merit of the contextual approach to the historical topics. So I searched and checked the contexts relating to the Roman imperialism in the middle republic. These contexts were offered by the famous historians and have been accepted as reliable approaches. But those approaches mostly deal with the individual accidents or happenings with narrow scope. Only two approaches deal with the whole empire in this period, that is, the economical view and the roman aristocratic view. Especially the latter view was offered by E.Badian and is now as the guide line for the comprehension of the Roman republic. I hope these 13 contexts help the history teacher making the teaching plans.
Next I proposed a new context for explaining the Roman imperialism. I found out a contradicting fact, that the Roman senate did not follow the policy of territorial expansion but as a result the Roman state acquired the foreign territories and made her land. In this happening the role of the allies was critical. So I composed a historical medium that the Roman allies had the initiatives in expansion policies. Then I applied the medium on the condition of Illyrian areas. The Roman policies here was explained well with the medium. So I could make my own historical context relating to the Roman imperialism. And I was convinced that the allies had influenced on the Roman imperialistic policies and focused on the promotion of their economic interest in the overseas trade. Without the armies of the allies, the Roman state could not maintain the empire in this period and the allies should supply to Rome the salaried manpower. This structure fits well with the historical context in which the allies had the initiatives in the Roman imperial policies with economic attributes. Maybe this type of relationship is called ‘social imperialism.’
I find the educational and heuristic merit of the contextual approach to the historical topics. So I searched and checked the contexts relating to the Roman imperialism in the middle republic. These contexts were offered by the famous historians and have been accepted as reliable approaches. But those approaches mostly deal with the individual accidents or happenings with narrow scope. Only two approaches deal with the whole empire in this period, that is, the economical view and the roman aristocratic view. Especially the latter view was offered by E.Badian and is now as the guide line for the comprehension of the Roman republic. I hope these 13 contexts help the history teacher making the teaching plans.
Next I proposed a new context for explaining the Roman imperialism. I found out a contradicting fact, that the Roman senate did not follow the policy of territorial expansion but as a result the Roman state acquired the foreign territories and made her land. In this happening the role of the allies was critical. So I composed a historical medium that the Roman allies had the initiatives in expansion policies. Then I applied the medium on the condition of Illyrian areas. The Roman policies here was explained well with the medium. So I could make my own historical context relating to the Roman imperialism. And I was convinced that the allies had influenced on the Roman imperialistic policies and focused on the promotion of their economic interest in the overseas trade. Without the armies of the allies, the Roman state could not maintain the empire in this period and the allies should supply to Rome the salaried manpower. This structure fits well with the historical context in which the allies had the initiatives in the Roman imperial policies with economic attributes. Maybe this type of relationship is called ‘social imperialism.’
목차
1. 서언
2. 로마 제국주의의 규정문제
3. 맥락의 갈래와 그 검증
4. 또 하나의 맥락-동맹국의 위상
5. 결어
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
로마 동맹국 전쟁 이후 이탈리아 自治都市의 구조와 中央의 통제
역사학보
2004 .12
-
로마 동맹국 전쟁 이후 자치도시(municipium) 건립의 추이와 조국의 이념
역사교육
2003 .12
-
Gods, soldiers, mummies: making Egypt Roman
서양고전학연구
2013 .12
-
로마 공화정기의 곡물문제와 정치
역사와 담론
2004 .09
-
佛敎敍事의 作話方式과 傳奇小說의 相關性(Ⅱ)
어문연구
2009 .01
-
Writing Korean with Roman Letters
Korea Journal
1982 .08
-
로마 공화정 후기의 정치상황 : 민회 활동을 중심으로
계명사학
2006 .11
-
로마교회의 납세문제와 로마제국－바울이 로마의 크리스천들에게 납세를 권면한 이유(롬 13:1-7)
대학과 선교
2014 .01
-
AN EXEGETICAL STUDY ON ROMANS 3 : 21-31
신학과세계
1989 .12
-
Roman soldiers in imperial Greek literature
서양고전학연구
2013 .12
-
As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History
성경원문연구
2017 .10
-
Roman Influences on the Developmental Nature of Christianity
신학논단
2004 .06
-
이탈리아 동맹국 전쟁까지 로마의 정책과 동맹국 지배층의 동향
역사교육
1998 .12
-
역사학 관점에서 본 한국 천주교회사 서술
교회사연구
2004 .12
-
브리튼(Britain)에서의 로마화(Romanization) : 로마 도시(Roman Town)의 기원과 건설을 중심으로
한국사학보
2005 .03
-
WHY DID GREEKS AND ROMANS FIGHT WARS?
서양고전학연구
2010 .06
-
제정초기 로마시의 곡물수요와 곡물수송에 대한 고찰
역사와 담론
2011 .04
-
서평 : 배은숙, 『강대국의 비밀』(글항아리, 2008)
계명사학
2008 .11
-
베스파시아누스 황제의 수사학 학교 신설조치의 사회교육적 배경
역사교육
2012 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-016553444