지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The basic ideology of the criminal procedure is to realize justice and protect the human rights of the suspect. It inevitably can't help violating the human rights of the suspect in the process of collecting and securing evidence by way of legal disposition like arrest and detention in order for the investigation agency to clarify the suspect, which consequently pursues the discovery of substantial truth and security of criminal procedure.
In the Criminal Procedure a mutual harmony of two ideas is required, however these two ideas, a national benefit from criminal prosecution, and the defense of the individual rights of suspects, conflict with each other.
The suspect-arrest and detention should be used as a last resort to maintain the harmony of two inter-confronting ideologies represented both by a substantial truth seeking for the justice realization and the protection of human rights applied to an individual. A legal procedure should be followed.
The Provisions of the arrest system have not been established in the Criminal Procedure Code but have been prescribed in the Constitution until the government adopted the arrest system as well as Judiciary's Interrogation system for a suspected person liable for detention on December, 29 1995.
The detention system in Korea is divided into "arrest" and "detention". "Arrest" is to detain suspects for a short period time during the early portion of the investigation, and "detention" is to detain criminal suspects for a relatively long period of time according to the existing law.
Arrest is the first disposition of legal force imposed on an individual's freedom in the early stages of the investigating procedure.
In order to detain a criminal suspect, there should be a reason for detention, causes for detention, and necessity of detention.
Therefore, the "Amended Criminal Procedure Code" sets its principle, prior warrant system, with which the detention is enacted by an advance warrant from a judge. And it introduces the "arrest warrant system", which also follows the principle of a "prior warrant system", to establish official investigation procedure by rooting out unlawful investigation customs such as voluntary company, protective custody, while exceptionally admitting a "post warrant system" in cases of "emergency capture" with strict terms and procedures.
In the Criminal Procedure a mutual harmony of two ideas is required, however these two ideas, a national benefit from criminal prosecution, and the defense of the individual rights of suspects, conflict with each other.
The suspect-arrest and detention should be used as a last resort to maintain the harmony of two inter-confronting ideologies represented both by a substantial truth seeking for the justice realization and the protection of human rights applied to an individual. A legal procedure should be followed.
The Provisions of the arrest system have not been established in the Criminal Procedure Code but have been prescribed in the Constitution until the government adopted the arrest system as well as Judiciary's Interrogation system for a suspected person liable for detention on December, 29 1995.
The detention system in Korea is divided into "arrest" and "detention". "Arrest" is to detain suspects for a short period time during the early portion of the investigation, and "detention" is to detain criminal suspects for a relatively long period of time according to the existing law.
Arrest is the first disposition of legal force imposed on an individual's freedom in the early stages of the investigating procedure.
In order to detain a criminal suspect, there should be a reason for detention, causes for detention, and necessity of detention.
Therefore, the "Amended Criminal Procedure Code" sets its principle, prior warrant system, with which the detention is enacted by an advance warrant from a judge. And it introduces the "arrest warrant system", which also follows the principle of a "prior warrant system", to establish official investigation procedure by rooting out unlawful investigation customs such as voluntary company, protective custody, while exceptionally admitting a "post warrant system" in cases of "emergency capture" with strict terms and procedures.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. ‘임의동행‘과 ‘보호실 유치‘에 따른 인권침해의 발생가능성
Ⅲ. ‘체포‘, ‘구속‘ 및 이에 관련된 법원의 ‘구속영장실질심사‘
Ⅳ. 체포ㆍ구속에 있어서 남용의 가능성 및 개선의 노력
Ⅴ. 법원의 ‘체포ㆍ구속적부심사‘와 기간 미산입의 문제
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
[Zusammenfassung]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전시공간에서의 장면에 의한 공간지각 표현방법에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2013 .10
-
건축적 관점에서 본 발해유적에 대한 한국의 연구동향
고구려발해연구
2011 .11
-
마감 재료의 질감 표현을 통한 건축 공간의 긴장도 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009 .04
-
나의 발해사 연구
한국고대사연구
2015 .12
-
발해의 5京과 교통로의 기능
한국고대사연구
2011 .09
-
박물관 전시공간구조와 관람객 움직임의 상관성 (Ⅰ) : 전시공간구조와 관람빈도, 밀도의 상관관계분석을 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2006 .10
-
건축공간론
건축
1969 .09
-
거실공간에서 공간지각을 유도하기 위한 조명계획에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2006 .10
-
공간의 시각적 이해과정에 나타난 성별 주시특성에 관한 연구
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2013 .10
-
발해국의 주민구성에 대한 연구 현황과 과제 : ‘高麗別種’과 ‘渤海族’을 둘러싼 논의를 중심으로
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
몽골국 내 발해 고고유적
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
발해 사회ㆍ경제사연구의 현황과 과제
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
발해 정치사의 연구 현황과 과제
한국사연구
2003 .09
-
관람객의 방문유형에 따른 전시환경 인지와 관람행태에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009 .12
-
태권체조와 음악줄넘기가 초등학생들의 뇌신경가소성에 미치는 효과
한국체육과학회지
2017 .04
-
임신 중 체중증가에 따른 영양섭취 및 임신결과와의 관련성
한국영양학회지
2010 .04
-
고속 철도 환경에서의 디지털 역지향성 안테나 기술 성능 분석
한국전자파학회논문지
2012 .11
-
관람객 피로를 중심으로 본 박물관 현장연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2003 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-367-015510464