지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.2
- 수록면
- 207 - 230 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I analyze how Jane Austen's Emma may be viewed in light of the concept of “cultural capital”, which is one of the core theories of the French socialist Pierre Bourdieu.
By the end of the novel, Harriet is married to Martin Elton, a rich farmer, Jane to Frank Churchill, and Emma to George Knightley. Though it has been said that these couples marry according to their economicㆍsocial status and their moral worth or maturity, the outcome can be understood more clearly when analyzed in terms of “cultural capital”. In brief, the marriage between Harriet and Martin, who possess economic capital but not cultural capital, is proper. Frank and Jane will also have a promising future, since Jane has cultural capital though she has no economic capital. Emma disregards her inferiors though she has everything (including cultural capital), but overcomes this weakness after her wrong judgement of Elton, Churchill, and Knightley. She will become an ideal member of her social class by her marriage to Knightley, who is a perfect gentleman with both economic and cultural capital.
In this analysis, it becomes clear that all three couples marry without crossing “the invisible border of class”. Thus Austen seems to demand not only economicㆍsocial capital but also “cultural capital” as a condition of nobility, and her way to distinguish between the landed gentry and the rapidly rising bourgeois seems to be an internalized sense of “cultural capital” in the former.
This approach to Emma in terms of “cultural capital” shows that the inheritance of “cultural capital” is a major means by which social class is propagated, an analysis of which has ramifications in the present day as well.
By the end of the novel, Harriet is married to Martin Elton, a rich farmer, Jane to Frank Churchill, and Emma to George Knightley. Though it has been said that these couples marry according to their economicㆍsocial status and their moral worth or maturity, the outcome can be understood more clearly when analyzed in terms of “cultural capital”. In brief, the marriage between Harriet and Martin, who possess economic capital but not cultural capital, is proper. Frank and Jane will also have a promising future, since Jane has cultural capital though she has no economic capital. Emma disregards her inferiors though she has everything (including cultural capital), but overcomes this weakness after her wrong judgement of Elton, Churchill, and Knightley. She will become an ideal member of her social class by her marriage to Knightley, who is a perfect gentleman with both economic and cultural capital.
In this analysis, it becomes clear that all three couples marry without crossing “the invisible border of class”. Thus Austen seems to demand not only economicㆍsocial capital but also “cultural capital” as a condition of nobility, and her way to distinguish between the landed gentry and the rapidly rising bourgeois seems to be an internalized sense of “cultural capital” in the former.
This approach to Emma in terms of “cultural capital” shows that the inheritance of “cultural capital” is a major means by which social class is propagated, an analysis of which has ramifications in the present day as well.
목차
Ⅰ. 부르디외의 ‘문화자본’
Ⅱ. ‘문화자본’과 계급
Ⅲ. 보이지 않는 계급의 경계선
인용 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『에머』에 나타난 여성권력의 실체
19세기 영어권 문학
2008 .08
-
『에마』의 서술자와 계층/젠더 문제
근대영미소설
2017 .01
-
古代 遷都의 역사적 의미
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
Emma’s Anxiety: Keeping Dominant Social Power
근대영미소설
2014 .01
-
韓國 古代의 王京과 都城, 地方都市
역사학보
2010 .09
-
Social Capital and Its Association with Health and Well-Being : An Individual-Level Analysis in Seoul, South Korea
Korea Journal
2011 .12
-
空間構造를 통해 본 新羅의 五小京과 渤海의 五京
역사와 담론
2009 .08
-
Formation of National Capital
Korea Journal
1962 .10
-
발해의 천도와 그 배경
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
Inducing Foreign Capital
Korea Journal
1962 .10
-
The Two Emmas: Female Education as Return on Capital and as Source of Income
영미문학페미니즘
2014 .01
-
발해 도성과 지방통치
고구려발해연구
2017 .07
-
Research on Government Social Capital Management of Chinese Cultural Enterprise -Taking the development history of Rongbaozhai as an example-
유라시아연구
2019 .01
-
Commentary on Social Capital in Korea
Korea Journal
2001 .09
-
[Sijo] Capital
Korea Journal
1977 .12
-
에마 우드하우스의 사회화 : 분리에서 연합으로
영어권문화연구
2017 .01
-
조선시대 한양의 수도성 : 도시의 위계와 공간표현을 중심으로
역사학보
2011 .03
-
신라의 王京과 小京
역사학보
2011 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-015215282