지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Indemnification provides financial protection by the corporation for its directors against exposure to expenses and liabilities that may be incurred by them in connection with legal proceedings based on an alleged breach of duty in their service to or on behalf of the corporation in United States.
The objective of this study is to explore whether an adopting of indemnification needs in Korea by examining the systems of liability and indemnification for directors in use in United States. And this article bases on the provisions of the Model Business Corporation Act indemnification statute.
Indemnification encourages capable individuals to serve as directors who are afraid of the risks and costs of litigation and innocent directors to resist unjust charges. And also it discourages groundless shareholder litigation. If permitted too broadly, however, indemnification may violate equally basic tenets of public policy. Indemnification is permitted only where it will further sound corporate policies and prohibited from protecting or encouraging wrongful or improper conduct. So the scope of indemnification provided by the law is limited. In effect, it would be difficult to justify indemnifying a director who has not met any of the standards of liability. Moreover, permissible indemnification is authorized as a matter of discretion, not as a matter of right.
I am of opinion that if there are instances that a director bears a excessive financial burden of any ensuing litigation, it would be a problem originated from the range of liability, not indemnification. Also indemnification has the possibility of disregard for the purpose of liability legislation. An indiscreet adoption of indemnification without statutory basis will be causing a confusion of the existing provisions defining the liabilities of directors after all.
The objective of this study is to explore whether an adopting of indemnification needs in Korea by examining the systems of liability and indemnification for directors in use in United States. And this article bases on the provisions of the Model Business Corporation Act indemnification statute.
Indemnification encourages capable individuals to serve as directors who are afraid of the risks and costs of litigation and innocent directors to resist unjust charges. And also it discourages groundless shareholder litigation. If permitted too broadly, however, indemnification may violate equally basic tenets of public policy. Indemnification is permitted only where it will further sound corporate policies and prohibited from protecting or encouraging wrongful or improper conduct. So the scope of indemnification provided by the law is limited. In effect, it would be difficult to justify indemnifying a director who has not met any of the standards of liability. Moreover, permissible indemnification is authorized as a matter of discretion, not as a matter of right.
I am of opinion that if there are instances that a director bears a excessive financial burden of any ensuing litigation, it would be a problem originated from the range of liability, not indemnification. Also indemnification has the possibility of disregard for the purpose of liability legislation. An indiscreet adoption of indemnification without statutory basis will be causing a confusion of the existing provisions defining the liabilities of directors after all.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국법상 이사의 책임발생요건과 이사에 대한 보상요건
Ⅲ. 보상제도 도입의 타당성에 대한 구체적 검토
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
손실보상 행정제도 개선에 따른 공익사업 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
주거환경
2018 .12
-
대표소송비용의 보상
법과 정책연구
2005 .06
-
理事의 責任에 대한 補償
동아법학
1985 .11
-
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF EMPLOYER AGAINST CALAMITY INDEMNIFICATION UNDER KOREAN LAW
저스티스
1963 .04
-
일본 상법상 이사의 책임제한과 분할책임론
기업법연구
2003 .09
-
2011년 개정상법상의 이사의 의무와 손해배상책임 : 이사의 책임제한을 중심으로
기업법연구
2012 .03
-
중국회사법상 이사의 제3자에 대한 책임에 관한 연구
고려법학
2009 .01
-
대리운전과 관련한 법률관계 분석 - 대리운전 중의 사고로 인해 사상자가 발생한 경우를 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2009 .01
-
理事의 責任制限에 관한 硏究
기업법연구
2004 .09
-
Compensation for the Slave Labour of Aliens ? : Aspects of international law in the indemnification of German national - socialist crime
서울국제법연구
1998 .06
-
사외이사의 책임면제 · 완화론에 대한 비판적 검토
기업법연구
2007 .06
-
理事의 제3자에 대한 責任에 관한 硏究
법학연구
1994 .12
-
삼성전자 판례에 나타난 법원의 경영판단의 원칙에 대한 태도와 이사의 책임 제한 - 대법원 2005. 10.28. 선고 2003다69638 판결 판례 평석 -
고려법학
2010 .01
-
이사의 임무태만책임의 법적 성질과 구조
기업법연구
2012 .09
-
상법상 이사의 책임제한에 대한 연구
비교사법
2008 .03
-
사용자책임에 있어서 구상권 제한의 법리
한양법학
2012 .08
-
일반건설기계의 대인배상Ⅰ 보험가입과법적 문제점
재산법연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-018058724