메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第21卷 第2號
발행연도
2007.6
수록면
97 - 125 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the United States, a theory that the outsider director should be reduced or indemnified from his responsibility had been asserted on the occasion of Smith v. Van Gorkom case which the Delaware supreme court had ruled out the principles of managerial judgement and recognized the responsibility of the outside director on the board of directors' decision of the merger in 1985. The theory produced rationales for reducing in and indemnifying from the responsibility such as the outside director's heavy burden of responsibility resulting from a flood of class actions, the non-life insurance companies' refusal or avoidance to accept the liability for executives as the result and the difficulty to scout for talented people to be inaugurated as outside directors. Although some states made laws that reduce the outside director's responsibility, they solved the problems of the system in the United States tort law through legislation and made efforts to solve the question of insurance companies to avoid accepting the liability for executives through any appropriate regulation because the crisis of the United States non-life insurance was due to the problem of the system in the United States tort law and the resultant avoidance to accept insurance rather than due directly to the increase of damages resulting from vexatious lawsuits. In Korea likewise, although a theory that the outside director should be reduced in or indemnified from his responsibility is being asserted, the outside director is like a full-time director in his powers and liabilities except that the former does not manage a company in person and is inferior to the standing directors only in the ways and means to grasp the information necessary for monitoring and supervising them. It preferably needs to reinforce the outside director's right to collect information and his obligation to keep trade secrets in order to prevent the secrets from being disclosed in return. Under the present Commercial Act, the outside director has ways and means for supervising and controlling full-time directors like the power to attend the board of directors and take an decision, other powers relating to a stockholders' meeting and various powers to lawsuit and the outside director is fully guaranteed to acquit of the responsibility only by requesting the board of directors to make an entry of his dissent and signing and sealing his name against the full-time directors' arbitrary decisions. In addition, as there is moch scope for the outside director to reduce or exempt from his responsibility by way of the application of the principles of managerial judgement and taking out a liability insurance, there is no need to take measures to ease or acquit of his responsibility particularly. Rather, I should advocate a fierce dog theory so that we can create an environment forcing the outside director to fall short of expectations of major stockholders who have appointed him as outside director and supervise thoroughly for fear of being accused of his responsibility in order to prevent the outside director's negligence of oversight by grooming a fierce dog super for calling the outside director full account.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 미국의 사외이사 책임면제 · 완화 논의
Ⅲ. 국내의 사외이사 책임면제 · 완화 논의
Ⅳ. 사외이사 책임면제 · 완화론의 부당성
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 대법원 1978. 6. 27. 선고 78다389 판결

    주식회사의 대표이사가 이사회의 결의를 거쳐야 할 대외적 거래행위에 관하여 이를 거치지 아니하고 한 경우라도 위와 같은 이사회 결의사항은 회사의 내부적 의사결정에 불과하다 할 것이므로 그 거래상대방이 그와같은 이사회결의가 없었음을 알거나 알 수 있었을 경우가 아니라면 그 거래행 위는 유효하다고 해석함이 상당하고 위와같은 상대방의 악의는 이를

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-016741259