지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Rulinwaishi is one of the most famous novels in the Qing dynasty. There have been many types of commentaries since it was published. The first thing was Woxiancaotang(臥閑草堂) commentary. After that, Huangxiaotian(黃小田)、Qishengtang(齊省堂)、and Tianmushancao(天目山樵)'s commentaries came into being.
The most influential one was Woxiancaotang's commentary(Woping).Woping was first published in 1803. But the preface of Xianzhailaoren was dated 1736. The contents of Woping were the main theme of this novel and the art of satire、the description、the evaluation of the characters etc.
Qishengtang's commentary(Qiping) was mostly made of marginal comments. It followed Woping's attitude. Tianmushancao's commentary(Tianping) was made by Tianmushancao Zhangwenhu(張文虎) who had a thorough knowlege of the methodolgy of historical research(考據學) which is dominated in the Qing dynasty. So Tianping's main stream was the search for the connection between literary reality and historical reality. Huangxiaotian's commentary(Huangping) was made immediately after Woping, but it had not been known for a long time. Huangping changed the other three commentaries' viewpoint which regarded Rulinwaishi not as a literature but as a branch of history. Consequently, the commentaries of Rulinwaishi brought readers to a deeper understanding.
The most influential one was Woxiancaotang's commentary(Woping).Woping was first published in 1803. But the preface of Xianzhailaoren was dated 1736. The contents of Woping were the main theme of this novel and the art of satire、the description、the evaluation of the characters etc.
Qishengtang's commentary(Qiping) was mostly made of marginal comments. It followed Woping's attitude. Tianmushancao's commentary(Tianping) was made by Tianmushancao Zhangwenhu(張文虎) who had a thorough knowlege of the methodolgy of historical research(考據學) which is dominated in the Qing dynasty. So Tianping's main stream was the search for the connection between literary reality and historical reality. Huangxiaotian's commentary(Huangping) was made immediately after Woping, but it had not been known for a long time. Huangping changed the other three commentaries' viewpoint which regarded Rulinwaishi not as a literature but as a branch of history. Consequently, the commentaries of Rulinwaishi brought readers to a deeper understanding.
목차
1. 머리말
2.『儒林外史』의 評點本
3. 맺음말
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Commentary
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2020 .04
-
Commentary on Social Capital in Korea
Korea Journal
2001 .09
-
Commentary on “Asian Values” and Confucian Discourse
Korea Journal
2001 .09
-
조선후기 불교 사기(私記)집성의 현황과 과제
불교학보
2012 .02
-
朝鮮朝 <老子> 註釋書에 나타난 儒·道 同異觀
한국사상과 문화
2005 .01
-
문심조룡소증(1)
동아문화
1966 .12
-
「일상수행의 요법」주석상의 제 문제
원불교사상과종교문화
2005 .02
-
번역 과정 중 문제 해결 전략에 대한 분석
통역과 번역
2004 .01
-
『大毘盧遮那經供養次第法疏』의 일본 전래와 계승의 의미-『大日經供養次第法疏私記』를 중심으로
불교연구
2020 .01
-
『老子河上公注』 硏究
도교문화연구
2002 .04
-
諸註釋을 통해 본 『論語』 經文의 解釋學的 理解〔4〕— ｢里仁｣을 중심으로 —
동양철학연구
2012 .01
-
한국 기신학(起信學) 연구의 지형과 내용
불교학보
2019 .03
-
韓ㆍ中ㆍ日 莊子學의 비교 검토를 통한 朴世堂ㆍ韓元震의 莊子注 연구 : 南宋 林希逸, 에도 하야시라잔과의 비교 검토를 중심으로
양명학
2010 .04
-
찬주분류두시의 편찬과 주해 방식
어문연구(語文硏究)
2019 .01
-
[시론] 과거는 짐이자 힘이다
역사와현실
2005 .12
-
『능엄경』 주소(註疏)를 통해 본 과문의 특징 - 『계환해』와 『정맥소』를 중심으로
불교학연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-820-017850978