지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine modernity of 'theory of national literature' in 1945 -1948. This paper is accomplished through special study on the Im Hwa's essays. Because Im Hwa's essays include general feature of essays written by other contemporary men of letters and theoretical kemel of 'theory of national literature' which is advocated by Federation of Korean Literary Men. (FKLM, Chosun Moonhakga Dongmaeng) In fact, he is the virtual leader of FKLM since foundation.
The main contents of Im Hwa's essays is as follows.
First, view of national literature was very emphasized compared with
contents of other papers written in colonial period. And so he kept his eyes on the group of literary men who inspired nationalism like Lee Tae-Choon. Chae Man-Shik, etc.
Second, importance of proletarian literature became smaller. On the other hand, importance of literature by literary men who inspired nationalism became larger. He insisted that above-mentioned two group of literary men had built UP a unified front together in the latter period of colonial regime.
Third, taking the place of bourgeoisie, the people including working class, peasantry, progressive citizen became the main group of bourgeois democratic revolution after the 1945 Liberation of Korea. Fourth, National literature would have to be perfectly modernistic national literature.
By the way, above-mentioned Im Hwa's insistences include several faults as given below.
First, he understood Colonization of Korea by Japanese Imperialism as not modem government but barbarous pillage. because of understanding like this, he insisted strongly that people had to remove remnants of colonial regime. but Korea in that time was in the condition of modernization to some degree already. In conclusion, on account of his disregard for modernization, he paid attention to feudalistic remnants of colonial regime excessively.
Second, he believed that working class was progressive and stood by the people. But his recognition like this is in the wrong. Because working class was unreflective class through the coercive training by Japanese disciplinary power. So working class was inadequate as main group of revolution. In order to be main group of revolution, working class had to changed into reflective class. But Im Hwa didn't understand this point.
After all, further studies on the modernity of 'theory of national literature' in 1945-1948 will have to aim at overcoming all insufficiency of Im Hwa's insistence referred to above.
The main contents of Im Hwa's essays is as follows.
First, view of national literature was very emphasized compared with
contents of other papers written in colonial period. And so he kept his eyes on the group of literary men who inspired nationalism like Lee Tae-Choon. Chae Man-Shik, etc.
Second, importance of proletarian literature became smaller. On the other hand, importance of literature by literary men who inspired nationalism became larger. He insisted that above-mentioned two group of literary men had built UP a unified front together in the latter period of colonial regime.
Third, taking the place of bourgeoisie, the people including working class, peasantry, progressive citizen became the main group of bourgeois democratic revolution after the 1945 Liberation of Korea. Fourth, National literature would have to be perfectly modernistic national literature.
By the way, above-mentioned Im Hwa's insistences include several faults as given below.
First, he understood Colonization of Korea by Japanese Imperialism as not modem government but barbarous pillage. because of understanding like this, he insisted strongly that people had to remove remnants of colonial regime. but Korea in that time was in the condition of modernization to some degree already. In conclusion, on account of his disregard for modernization, he paid attention to feudalistic remnants of colonial regime excessively.
Second, he believed that working class was progressive and stood by the people. But his recognition like this is in the wrong. Because working class was unreflective class through the coercive training by Japanese disciplinary power. So working class was inadequate as main group of revolution. In order to be main group of revolution, working class had to changed into reflective class. But Im Hwa didn't understand this point.
After all, further studies on the modernity of 'theory of national literature' in 1945-1948 will have to aim at overcoming all insufficiency of Im Hwa's insistence referred to above.
목차
1. 식민지적 근대와 해방 공간의 민족문학론
2. 근대 문학사에 대한 인식의 변모 양상
3. 민주주의 민족문학론의 이론적 구조
4. 근대화의 산물인 식민지적 인간의 개조 문제
5. 해결하지 못한 과제로서의 근대성
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
임화 시에 나타난 근대 풍경과 이념적 시선의 변모과정 : 식민지적 근대와 시선의 계보학(3)
한국시학연구
2008 .12
-
해방기 임화의 ‘현대의 민족 이념’
인문과학연구
2010 .08
-
비평정신과 테크놀로지 -식민지 시기 임화의 근대성 인식과 성찰
구보학보
2019 .01
-
임화의 1920년대 중반∼1930년대 초 문학론 연구
국어국문학
1995 .05
-
일제하 林和의 언어관과 ‘民族’의 포착
사학연구
2010 .12
-
시의 논리와 논리의 운명 - 임화 시 연구
돈암어문학
2004 .12
-
임화의 언어론－1930년대 중ㆍ후반의 견해를 중심으로－
국어국문학
2004 .12
-
〈네거리의 순이〉의 영화적 요소에 관한 연구
한국시학연구
2003 .11
-
National Literature of Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
임화가 바라본 이광수
춘원연구학보
2019 .12
-
"임화의 초기 문학론 연구
국어국문학
1994 .05
-
1980年代 末 '급진적 민족문학론' 연구 : 김명인과 조정환을 중심으로
우리문학연구
2006 .08
-
해방기 비평의 몇 가지 논점-임화를 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2016 .08
-
임화의 통속소설론과 문학사론의 관계―저널리즘 인식을 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
1930년대 후반 임화의 시 연구
한국시학연구
2005 .08
-
임화의 ‘이식문화론’에 나타난 탈식민성 : 호미 바바의 ‘혼종성’ 담론을 중심으로
국어문학
2012 .08
-
탈-식민의 거울, 임화
한국학연구
2002 .11
-
윤재천 수필문학론의 미적 특성 연구
어문론집
2020 .03
-
The Direction of National Literature in the 1990s
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
우리 문학의 연구 현황과 전망
우리말글
2004 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014537532