지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The newly arrived Confucian officials were all trying to solve the problem; that were haunting the dying Koryo dynasty, but differed in their methods and range of activities. People who supported the approach to enlist personnel to be stationed around the King and to privately support the Royal ruling power, clashed with people who opposed that kind of approach. People who considered resolving social and economical problems as top priorities, faced other people who thought otherwise. People's opinion over the diplomatic relationship with Yuan and Ming also significantly varied, And policies of the time had to mirror all these variances.
The biggest reason for this diverse nature of the Neo-Confucians policies was their various attitudes (oward issues like dismantling the Jeongbang office, or resurrecting the Nokgwa-jeon practice, or bringing justice to the land system or selecting right persons for the job armed with sincere intentions and needed talents, In the end they were all pursuing to enrich and strengthen the country (富國强兵). They were just not being unanimous in terms of the methods and the methods' viability, as some insisted the role of the government, while some insisted the role of the officials.
Some of them supported the approach of stabilizing the landlord system based on independent agricultural units(peasant households) by ownership verification over men and land, and alleviating the taxational pressive imposed upon the public, Some of them insisted a full scale reformation of private land ownerships and tried to protect the interest of the minor peasants, In other words, the farmer pursued to improve the existing land system and mitigate the tax pressure in order to stabilize the public life, while the latter argued that a new land system(the Jeongjeon-jae(正田制) practice) was required, and the taxation must be reformed to secure more income in order to support the national finance at1d a buildup of a stronger army.
And their cause of dismantling the Jeongbang office, which had been primarily set to pursue the reestablishment of the King's ruling authority, was modified by Cho Jun(趙浚) and Jeong Do Jeon(鄭道傳) to the argument of 'Able persons should be secured', which was basically a very official-oriented argument in itself. This was the most vivid difference from certain factions inside the realm of the Neo-Confucians. To maintain the existing system based on the authority of the King, or change the system with officials as the practical leading figures, was the subject of the most vivid dashes of ideas, this confrontation ultimately resulted in political clashes between entities who wished to uphold the traditional paradigm and guard the Koryo dynasty, and entities who pursued to find a new dynasty with all the new administration and reformations in place.
The biggest reason for this diverse nature of the Neo-Confucians policies was their various attitudes (oward issues like dismantling the Jeongbang office, or resurrecting the Nokgwa-jeon practice, or bringing justice to the land system or selecting right persons for the job armed with sincere intentions and needed talents, In the end they were all pursuing to enrich and strengthen the country (富國强兵). They were just not being unanimous in terms of the methods and the methods' viability, as some insisted the role of the government, while some insisted the role of the officials.
Some of them supported the approach of stabilizing the landlord system based on independent agricultural units(peasant households) by ownership verification over men and land, and alleviating the taxational pressive imposed upon the public, Some of them insisted a full scale reformation of private land ownerships and tried to protect the interest of the minor peasants, In other words, the farmer pursued to improve the existing land system and mitigate the tax pressure in order to stabilize the public life, while the latter argued that a new land system(the Jeongjeon-jae(正田制) practice) was required, and the taxation must be reformed to secure more income in order to support the national finance at1d a buildup of a stronger army.
And their cause of dismantling the Jeongbang office, which had been primarily set to pursue the reestablishment of the King's ruling authority, was modified by Cho Jun(趙浚) and Jeong Do Jeon(鄭道傳) to the argument of 'Able persons should be secured', which was basically a very official-oriented argument in itself. This was the most vivid difference from certain factions inside the realm of the Neo-Confucians. To maintain the existing system based on the authority of the King, or change the system with officials as the practical leading figures, was the subject of the most vivid dashes of ideas, this confrontation ultimately resulted in political clashes between entities who wished to uphold the traditional paradigm and guard the Koryo dynasty, and entities who pursued to find a new dynasty with all the new administration and reformations in place.
목차
Ⅱ. 新興儒臣의 政治體制 改革論과 그 性格
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Between Confucian Ideology and the State : A New Approach to Understanding the Literati Purge of 1519
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2002 .12
-
These People in This Land
Korea Journal
1971 .07
-
특집:원간섭기 유교지식인의 사상적 지형/원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
高麗末 恭讓王代 新興儒臣의 對立과 政治運營論(上)
사학연구
2004 .09
-
20세기 후반 고려 전시과 연구의 定礎 : 《高麗土地制度史硏究》를 통해본 강진철의 연구 성과와 의의
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
[논문] 고려 현종대 정치와 이계(吏系) 관료
역사와현실
2005 .03
-
특집:원간섭기 유교지식인의 사상적 지형/14세기 유학자의 현실인식과 성리학 수용과정의 연구 - 민지의 사례를 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
古代 領域 관념의 형성과 王土意識
한국사연구
2005 .06
-
Dynamics of Stability and Longevity of the Yi Dynasty : A Contribution of Korean Neo-Confucians
Korea Journal
1978 .09
-
경남 창원지역 토지조사의 시행과정과 장부체계의 변화
역사와현실
2007 .09
-
선조대 사림파의 정국 장악과 개혁노선의 충돌 : 선조 8년(1575) 동ㆍ서 분당의 사회경제적 배경과 관련하여
한국사연구
2006 .03
-
[기획1 : 한국고대사회를 어떻게 볼 것인가] 삼국 및 통일신라의 지배구조와 수취제의 성격
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
19세기 조선과 베트남의 토지개혁론에 대한 비교사적 검토 : 토지소유를 둘러싼 제도와 관습의 차이를 중심으로
역사학보
2010 .06
-
중국의 도시화와 공공토지 사유화
역사비평
2016 .08
-
고려 충혜왕의 행적과 정치적 입장
한국인물사연구
2010 .03
-
특집:원간섭기 유교지식인의 사상적 지형/원간섭기 『사서집주』이해와 성리학 수용
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
[특집:영조 후반기 탕평정치의 변화와 정치 세력의 동향] 1740년(영조 16) 이후 영조의 정치 운영
역사와현실
2004 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0