메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 대한건축학회논문집 - 계획계 제20권 제11호
발행연도
2004.11
수록면
239 - 248 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This is the second part of our study already published in No.184 of AIK Journal (2004. 02) under same title. In this study we chose increased number of 104 cases of high-rise apartment estates in capital region to make analysis of exterior landscape factors.
Our intention was laid on the verification of the suggestions from the conclusion of the former study introducing new quantified standards. We tried to prove that they can be served as better tool for the study of landscape in urban high-rise area, and to suggest the scope and practical limits of quantified standards in the process of planning for the urban landscape.
In this study we chose and analyzed, as additional factors to consider, the size of apartment estates including apartment buildings' floor area and the number of households, feature of visual blockage, and building height as important factors affecting visual blockage in high-rise housing landscape.
Our suggestion, as conclusion of our study, for the limits index for the Visual Blockage Ratio is as follows: 1) the maximum number of facade area to be 3,000㎡ 2) maximum and mean value of Elevation Blockage Ratio to be respectively below 60% and 50%, 3) maximum and mean value of the Linear Blockage Ratio to be respectably below 60% and 50%. It is also highly recommended to enhance the recognition of the concept of visual blockage in planning practice so as to lead to the production of adequate checklists applicable from the early stage of the planning, especially for high-rise apartment building estates as well as for all of the agglomerations of tall buildings dominating urban scene nowadays.

목차

Abstract

1. 서론

2. 차폐도의 지표기준의 개념

3. 기존 아파트단지 사례의 분석

4. 사례단지의 배치 대안에 따른 차폐율 개선방안제시

5. 차폐율의 지표기준치 제안

6. 결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-014402077