지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to examine the peculiarities of Roman family in the 1st century A.D.,not to say its transformation. It was thought that a Roman family had the form of the extended family which consisted of several conjugal families, and all members were subject to patria potestas. Contrary to the literary and legal concepts of familia and domus, the general character of Roman family seems to be 'mixtured-small-family' sub eo tecto, not a nuclear family as R. Saller said.
The stereotype image of legal authoritarianism of pater familias was mitigated more and more in the 1st century A.D. The husband-wife and parent-child relations implied reciprocal responsibility, affection and discord as in modern societies. The Romans became to know that the bases of the family are not only authority but also affection and devotion, more definitely 'love'. We can find the familial affection and devotion in the notion of pietas in the literary sources and more simple-direct expressions in inscriptions in the 1st century A.D. So I cannot but agree with the argumentations of P. Veyne.
The Roman family in the 1st century A.D. was small too. A form of large family was exceptional. This was to a large extent the result of disasters such as wars, epidemics, famines etc, not to say homosexuality and extra-marital relations and high infant mortality rate. But most of parents wanted to limit the number of their offsprings, to have, as we have seen, no more than one or two children. They had recourse to a variety of family-planning practices. In purpose these resemble those of our own age, but in application and also in frequency they are often quite different. most often we hear of exposure, less of abortion, least of all of contraception. This dose not mean that infanticide and exposure were the unique and most common form of family planning. Rather, its meaning is that we should not forget the practice attracted far more attention than contraception or even abortion.
The stereotype image of legal authoritarianism of pater familias was mitigated more and more in the 1st century A.D. The husband-wife and parent-child relations implied reciprocal responsibility, affection and discord as in modern societies. The Romans became to know that the bases of the family are not only authority but also affection and devotion, more definitely 'love'. We can find the familial affection and devotion in the notion of pietas in the literary sources and more simple-direct expressions in inscriptions in the 1st century A.D. So I cannot but agree with the argumentations of P. Veyne.
The Roman family in the 1st century A.D. was small too. A form of large family was exceptional. This was to a large extent the result of disasters such as wars, epidemics, famines etc, not to say homosexuality and extra-marital relations and high infant mortality rate. But most of parents wanted to limit the number of their offsprings, to have, as we have seen, no more than one or two children. They had recourse to a variety of family-planning practices. In purpose these resemble those of our own age, but in application and also in frequency they are often quite different. most often we hear of exposure, less of abortion, least of all of contraception. This dose not mean that infanticide and exposure were the unique and most common form of family planning. Rather, its meaning is that we should not forget the practice attracted far more attention than contraception or even abortion.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 논의의 전제들
Ⅲ. 가족 관념의 변화
Ⅳ. 가족 재생산의 특징
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Family System
Korea Journal
1977 .05
-
고대 로마의 임신과 피임에 대한 이론과 실제
역사와경계
2010 .09
-
가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 연구 : 대학생 자녀를 둔 가정을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2015 .06
-
KOREAN FAMILY SYSTEM
Korea Journal
1961 .11
-
일본의 가족 형태에 대한 연구사적 규명
일본문화연구
2015 .01
-
가족사, 가장 오래된 새로운 역사 : 한국 근현대 가족사 연구의 현황과 과제
역사비평
2013 .08
-
조경란 소설에 나타난 가족의 의미 : 『가족의 기원』과 『움직임』을 중심으로
비평문학
2006 .04
-
한국 가족의 변화 양상에 따른 가족복지정책의 평가와 발전방향
신학과 목회
2005 .11
-
현대 가정의 위기와 정체성
기독교교육정보
2005 .04
-
The Study on Transformation of Family Structure and Orientation of Family Welfare in Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2005 .12
-
장애아동을 위한 가족중심실천의 구성요인 및 실천 과제
신학과 목회
2013 .05
-
Changing Korean Family and the Old
Korea Journal
1973 .06
-
입시 청소년 가족을 위한 기독상담적 접근: 드라마 ‘SKY캐슬’ 가족분석을 중심으로
신학논단
2020 .09
-
러시아 가족형태 다양화와 여성의 역할 문제: 대도시 여성의 일·가족 양립 경험을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2018 .01
-
가족건강성이 힐링에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구 -자원봉사기관의 자원봉사자를 중심으로-
유라시아연구
2019 .01
-
디지털시대의 기독교 가족상담 패러다임 변화와 대책
기독교교육정보
2005 .04
-
‘열린’ 가족 담론에 대한 불교적 검토
불교학연구
2007 .01
-
현대 러시아 가족정책의 동향 : 가족정책의 쟁점과 방향성에 관한 연구를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2011 .03
-
Social Function of the Family
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
가족의 회복인가 해체인가? - 카프카의 『변신』과 무라카미 류의 『최후의 가족』에 나타나는 가족문제
세계문학비교연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
로마 공화정말 제정초기의 노예 가족(slave family)
차전환
역사와 담론
1999
.09
초기기독교 공동체에 나타난 사회적 긴장과 연합
김춘기
신학과 목회
1990
.04
출애굽기의 개념성 연구
장석정
한국기독교신학논총
2005
.01
미메시스 비평으로 살펴본 사도행전의 기적적인 탈출과 사울의 저항 : 사도행전 12:6-10; 16:25-26; 26:14를 중심으로
조재형
신약논단
2014
.09
그리스 민주정치의 맥락에서 본 에베소 폭동사건 : 사도행전 19:23-41의 에베소 폭동 사건 보도와 초기 그리스도인들의 사회적 정체성
박영호
신약논단
2014
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013768506