금융감독체계 개편을 위한 법적 제언

김은경

doi:10.35227/HYLR.2025.2.36.1.105

추천

검색

질문

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 김은경 (한국외국어대학교)

저널정보: 한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제36권 제1집(통권 제89집)

발행연도: 2025.2

수록면: 105 - 129 (25page)

DOI: 10.35227/HYLR.2025.2.36.1.105

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Where a financial market exists, there is a corresponding need for financial supervision. This is because the presence of diverse participants in the financial market requires securing the transparency and fairness of the market as a fundamental prerequisite. In South Korea, where there is a financial market, financial supervision also exists, regulated by the Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "FSC Establishment Act"). The Financial Services Commission (FSC) has the authority to establish both financial industry policies and supervisory policies, while the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), which is under the FSC, carries out supervisory enforcement. This has led to a conflict of interest between policy-making and supervision, distorting the order of the financial market.
Since issues started arising with the financial supervisory system, there has been increasing demand for its reform. The calls for reform stem from the mixing of financial policies and supervision, structural problems within the financial bureaucracy, government-led finance, and the lack of independence of financial supervision. Between 1998 and 1999, during the IMF crisis, the harmful effects of government-led finance in South Korea were pointed out, leading to the restructuring of the financial supervisory system, which inaugurated the era of an integrated financial supervisory organization. The new integrated supervisory body was the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), which served as the decision-making body, and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), which carried out the supervision. The chairs of the FSC and the FSS were held concurrently. At that time, administrative functions were supported by a civil servant organization, creating a unified supervisory system. However, over time, due to the continued expansion of the civil servant organization under the FSS, a de facto dual supervisory system was established, which led to the creation of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) as the higher organization. The main goals at that time were to modernize the financial industry and increase the accountability of financial administration. To achieve this, the FSC Establishment Act was enacted in 2008, and the Government Organization Act was amended, transitioning fully to the current dual structure of the FSC and the FSS. Since then, the FSC has handled both financial policies and supervisory policies, while the FSS, under the FSC, has carried out supervision. However, during this process, a contradiction was identified in the conflicting roles of the FSC: on one hand, 'encouraging (or promoting)' in its policy-making role, and on the other, 'suppressing' in its supervisory role. Examples of adverse effects include the 2011 savings bank crisis, the 2013 Dong-yang crisis, the 2016 KIKO crisis, and the 2019-2020 private equity fund crisis.
It has now become urgent to reform the financial supervisory system. From the perspective of advancing the financial market and improving the efficiency of supervision, the FSC should be abolished due to its role in creating adverse effects from the integration of financial industry policies and supervisory policies. Instead, financial industry policy should be transferred to the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF). The FSS should focus on financial supervisory policies and their enforcement, ensuring the macroeconomic soundness of a transparent and fair financial market, and handling financial institution licensing. Furthermore, the Financial Consumer Protection Department, currently under the FSS, should be newly transitioned into the Financial Consumer Protection Agency as an independent organization, which would be responsible for overseeing business activities and financial consumer protection in accordance with the Financial Consumer Protection Act. The FSS and the Financial Consumer Protection Agency should be established as non-capital special corporations. To achieve this, the FSC Establishment Act and the Government Organization Act should be amended.

#금융위원회 설치에 관한 법률 #금융소비자보호법 #금융위원회 #금융감독원 #금융소비자보호원 #금융감독체계개편 #Act on the Establishment of the Financial Services Commission #Financial Consumer Protection Act #Financial Supervisory Commission #Financial Supervisory Service #Financial Consumer Protection Agency #Reforming the Financial Supervisory System

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092473061

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (0)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)