지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the tradition of Melchizedek from his initial historical appearance in the Old Testament to his depiction in the Qumran Scrolls and the New Testament. In Genesis 14, Melchizedek is introduced as the historical king and priest of Salem who blesses Abram after a victorious battle. This brief yet significant encounter presents Melchizedek as a figure connected to both royalty and priesthood, titles that hold theological significance in later interpretations. By the time we reach Psalm 110, Melchizedek has transformed from a historical figure into a symbolic representation of King David, portrayed as a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek, sitting at God’s right hand. The New Testament, particularly in the Epistle to the Hebrews, elevates this transformation further by depicting Melchizedek as a typology of Christ, whose eternal priesthood supersedes that of the Levitical order.
The Qumran Scrolls play a crucial role in bridging the Old and New Testament perceptions of Melchizedek. Documents such as the Genesis Apocryphon, Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice, and 11QMelchizedek present Melchizedek in a more eschatological and celestial context. In these texts, Melchizedek takes on a role beyond that of a historical king and priest; he is portrayed as a heavenly figure, one who presides over divine judgment and is associated with the ultimate redemption of God’speople in the eschaton. In particular, 11QMelchizedek describes him as amessianic figure who will defeat the forces of evil, represented by Belial,and bring about the year of God’s favor, thus fulfilling an essential role in the apocalyptic expectations of the Qumran community.
This study traces the development of the Melchizedek tradition through various phases : from his depiction as a historical figure in Genesis, to a symbolic king-priest in the Psalms, and finally to a messianic and priestly figure in the New Testament and Second Temple Jewish texts. By examining these texts, the paper demonstrates how the understanding of Melchizedek evolved over time, particularly in relation to the concept of eternal priesthood and eschatological salvation, and how these developments influenced early Christian theology, particularly in the understanding of Christ’s priesthood. The research highlights the significance of Melchizedek in the theological and eschatological imagination of both Jewish and Christian traditions, underscoring his role as a bridge between the two Testaments and as a central figure in discussions about messianism and divine intervention in the history of salvation.
The Qumran Scrolls play a crucial role in bridging the Old and New Testament perceptions of Melchizedek. Documents such as the Genesis Apocryphon, Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice, and 11QMelchizedek present Melchizedek in a more eschatological and celestial context. In these texts, Melchizedek takes on a role beyond that of a historical king and priest; he is portrayed as a heavenly figure, one who presides over divine judgment and is associated with the ultimate redemption of God’speople in the eschaton. In particular, 11QMelchizedek describes him as amessianic figure who will defeat the forces of evil, represented by Belial,and bring about the year of God’s favor, thus fulfilling an essential role in the apocalyptic expectations of the Qumran community.
This study traces the development of the Melchizedek tradition through various phases : from his depiction as a historical figure in Genesis, to a symbolic king-priest in the Psalms, and finally to a messianic and priestly figure in the New Testament and Second Temple Jewish texts. By examining these texts, the paper demonstrates how the understanding of Melchizedek evolved over time, particularly in relation to the concept of eternal priesthood and eschatological salvation, and how these developments influenced early Christian theology, particularly in the understanding of Christ’s priesthood. The research highlights the significance of Melchizedek in the theological and eschatological imagination of both Jewish and Christian traditions, underscoring his role as a bridge between the two Testaments and as a central figure in discussions about messianism and divine intervention in the history of salvation.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 구약성서의 멜기세덱
3. 1Q창세기 외경(1Q20)의 멜기세덱
4. 안식일의 노래(4Q401, 11Q17)의 멜기세덱
5. 11Q멜기세덱(11Q13)의 멜기세덱
6. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
멜기세덱의 반차에 대한 선교신학적 함의 연구: 창14:18-20; 시110:4; 히5:6-11; 6:20; 7:1-28을 중심으로
선교신학
2020 .01
-
삼위일체 하나님 신앙고백 관점에서 본 멜기세덱에 관한 선교신학적 함의 연구
선교와 신학
2021 .02
-
쿰란 전쟁문서(1QM)의 세계관
구약논단
2022 .12
-
‘제사장-왕’을 통한 야훼의 통치 : 시편 110편의 해석과 적용
구약논단
2017 .12
-
1970년대 과학소설의 가능성과 딜레마-오영석의 「신약창세기」 연구
구보학보
2022 .08
-
Historical Jesus and Qumran Literature
Catholic Theology and Thought
2019 .01
-
4Q174 Florilegium에 나타난 쿰란 공동체의 현세적 열망
구약논단
2024 .06
-
쿰란 문서에 나타난 히브리어 māšîaḥ에 관한 소고
한국기독교신학논총
2018 .10
-
쿰란-에세네 공동체에 대한 역사적 고찰
신학지남
2021 .12
-
Is the Old Testament Too Old for Christian Ethics?
성경원문연구
2020 .10
-
구약성서 속 작은 자 배려와 그 적용
신학과 목회
2019 .05
-
구약성서와 인문학 : 역사, 문학, 철학으로 읽는 구약성서
구약논단
2017 .09
-
히브리서 9장 23-26절의 수직적 구조의 종말론적 성전제의에 나타난 천지합일 사상
신약논단
2016 .09
-
구약성서와 신약성서의 관계 : 다니엘서와 요한계시록을 중심으로
구약논단
2018 .12
-
Reading the Qumranic Canonicity from the Confucian Context
Canon&Culture
2022 .04
-
김찬국의 구약 역사신학 - 구약 역사서를 중심으로
신학논단
2019 .09
-
쿰란의 청동 두루마리(3Q15)에 관한 연구
가톨릭신학
2017 .01
-
개혁주의 관점에서 본 안식 개념과 주일성수
신학지남
2015 .06
-
하나님 이름 표기와 역대기 사가의 신학적 전망 연구
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
Measuring the םאה (pe’ah) to the Poor: Examining Legal Interpretations about Leviticus 19:9-10 in Qumran and Rabbinic Halakhah
성경원문연구
2020 .04
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092231796