메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Yong-Hyun Cho (Honam Theological University and Seminary)
저널정보
한국구약학회 구약논단 구약논단 제30권 제3호 통권93집
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
304 - 326 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to explore the porousness of binary oppositions concerning gender in Judges 1 : 11-15. This passage has garnered significant attention due to the unusual portrayal of a female character, Achsah. Scholars have often diminished her agency, instead emphasizing the role of her husband, Othniel, or presenting her as an exemplary female resisting ancient patriarchy. However, these interpretations paradoxically reinforce hierarchical gender dynamics, thereby perpetuating a dichotomy between male and female. This paper does not seek to subvert the gender hierarchy but aims to illuminate the permeable nature of binary oppositions concerning gender in Judges 1 : 11-15 through deconstructive criticism.
First, the ambiguous description of Achsah’s action ‘to incite him’ (רַחְּסִיתֵהוּ[wattĕsît_ ēhû/and she incited him]) in the Masoretic Text of Judges 1 : 14a raises the question, “Who incited whom?”. Neither the male characters, Caleb and Othniel, nor the female character, Achsah, consistently occupy the roles of subject and object; rather, they fluctuate between these positions. Second, the binary opposition of fertility versus barrenness is addressed through Achsah’s request for a field and the acquisition of springs of water in Judges 1 : 15. While her request could be interpreted as a complaint about arid land or a protest against her father Caleb’s mistreatment, it can also be seen as her strategic move to mitigate the risk of barrenness and secure fertility. Consequently, this deconstructive reading of Judges 1 : 11-15 reveals that the distinctions between subject and object, as well as fertility and barrenness, in relation to gender, are blurred and porous.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Deconstructive Criticism
3. The Deconstruction of the Subject-Object Opposition
4. The Deconstruction of the Fertility-Barrenness Opposition
Bibliography
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091185535