지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第171輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 309 - 373 (65page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2024.09.171.309
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On August 30, 2013, high school Korean History textbook authored by the New Right and published by Kyohaksa passed the final approval for certification. This paper aims to elucidate how the New Right beautified pro-Japanese collaboration and distorted the identity of the Republic of Korea through an analysis of the Kyohaksa textbook’s portrayal of the Japanese colonial period.
The New Right contends that the “colonial exploitation theory,” which emphasizes exploitation and oppression during the colonial period, is a groundless claim that distorts or exaggerates facts based on ethnic bias. Instead, they interprets the Japanese colonial period from the perspective of “colonial modernization theory.” From this standpoint, the New Right glorifies pro-Japanese collaborators as “pioneers of modern civilization.”
However, the New Right’s so-called colonial modernization theory, which embellishes the Japanese occupation as modernization, capitalization, and civilization, is far removed from both public sentiment and scholarly research findings. The New Right posits that the Republic of Korea was established primarily by pro-American forces representing liberal democracy and pro-Japanese factions representing the civilization movement. They further assert that the Republic of Korea was founded on the ideologies of liberal democracy and free-market economy.
Consequently, the Kyohaksa textbook authored by the New Right stated that “the First Constitution of the Republic of Korea was based on the fundamental ideology of liberal democracy.” Regarding this New Right claim about liberal democracy being the fundamental ideology of the Constitution, which embodies t he i dentity o f t he R epublic o f K orea, t he h istorical academia has judged it as “a distortion aimed at concealing the non-liberal democratic characteristics of the First Constitution.”
It is a widely accepted view in historical academia that the fundamental ideology of the First Constitution, which succeeded the Charter of the Founding of the Nation―a set of principles for future society agreed upon by independence movement forces―was not liberal democracy but “social democracy.” The historical academic community perceives the democracy of the Republic of Korea not as an “imported product” from foreign countries, but as a “historical formation” that was developed through the struggle against colonial oppression and discrimination.
The New Right contends that the “colonial exploitation theory,” which emphasizes exploitation and oppression during the colonial period, is a groundless claim that distorts or exaggerates facts based on ethnic bias. Instead, they interprets the Japanese colonial period from the perspective of “colonial modernization theory.” From this standpoint, the New Right glorifies pro-Japanese collaborators as “pioneers of modern civilization.”
However, the New Right’s so-called colonial modernization theory, which embellishes the Japanese occupation as modernization, capitalization, and civilization, is far removed from both public sentiment and scholarly research findings. The New Right posits that the Republic of Korea was established primarily by pro-American forces representing liberal democracy and pro-Japanese factions representing the civilization movement. They further assert that the Republic of Korea was founded on the ideologies of liberal democracy and free-market economy.
Consequently, the Kyohaksa textbook authored by the New Right stated that “the First Constitution of the Republic of Korea was based on the fundamental ideology of liberal democracy.” Regarding this New Right claim about liberal democracy being the fundamental ideology of the Constitution, which embodies t he i dentity o f t he R epublic o f K orea, t he h istorical academia has judged it as “a distortion aimed at concealing the non-liberal democratic characteristics of the First Constitution.”
It is a widely accepted view in historical academia that the fundamental ideology of the First Constitution, which succeeded the Charter of the Founding of the Nation―a set of principles for future society agreed upon by independence movement forces―was not liberal democracy but “social democracy.” The historical academic community perceives the democracy of the Republic of Korea not as an “imported product” from foreign countries, but as a “historical formation” that was developed through the struggle against colonial oppression and discrimination.
목차
1. 序言
2. 일제의 식민 통치
3. 민족 운동의 전개
4. 結語
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자유민주주의의 위기와 민주주의의 두 가지 대안: 숙의민주주의와 급진민주주의 연구
대동철학
2022 .12
-
경제민주주의의 상호주관적 정당화와 해명
대동철학
2016 .01
-
'중국식 민주'의 역사적 형성과 의미: '사회주의민주'의 수용과 왜곡 사이에서
동아연구
2017 .08
-
대의민주주의의 모순과참여민주주의에 대한 열망－1968년 프랑스 노동자 총파업과 자주경영(autogestion)－
인문과학
2018 .01
-
한국 민주주의와 정당정치 활성화
한국민족문화
2020 .11
-
생명과 생태를 생각하는 대안적 민주주의로서의 생태민주주의
생명연구
2018 .02
-
1950~60년대 자유민주주의 개념의 궤적?『사상계』를 중심으로 ?
개념과 소통
2021 .01
-
The Clash over "Democracy" between the United States and the Soviet Union in the Korean Liberation Period, 1946-1947
Korea Observer
2020 .01
-
『조선(朝鮮)の특산(特産)』으로 보는 일제강점기 식품 특산물 현황 분석
한국식생활문화학회지
2019 .01
-
在朝鮮日本人浅川伯教 · 巧兄弟と柳宗悦の朝鮮伝統文化理解の特質 : 初期の活動を中心に
일본문화학보
2018 .11
-
Rethinking Imperialism and Constitutional Democracy in Interwar Japan and Colonial Taiwan
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2021 .06
-
플라톤의 이상국가론과 민주주의 비판의 현대적 함의: 『국가ㆍ正體』에서의 논의를 중심으로
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
Democratic Transition and Economic Democracy in Korea
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2017 .11
-
민주주의는 개발주의에 어떻게 잠식되어왔는가 ―1960년대 한국 지성계의 ‘발전’에 대한 강박
역사비평
2021 .02
-
1910-20년대 초 신지식층의 민주주의 인식과 현실활용 -일본유학생과 동아일보의 논의를 중심으로-
한국사상사학
2017 .01
-
근대일본의 식민지 동화주의의 실패─ 박춘금(朴春琴)의 경우 ─
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
역사학과 민주주의
역사와현실
2025 .03
-
민주주의와 삶 : 미셸 앙리의 민주주의 비판
현상학과 현대철학
2017 .09
-
근대 민주주의의 역설과 랑시에르 민주주의 논의의 함의 : 영화〈콘크리트 유토피아〉를 중심으로
인문콘텐츠
2024 .09
-
대의 및 참여 민주주의의 전개 양상과 쟁점 탐색
윤리연구
2023 .06
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
모넨신 첨가 수준이 반추위 미생물에 의한 발효성상, 메탄발생량 및 건물 분해율에 미치는 영향
Guang-Lin
,
Jin
,
지병주
외 5명
동물생명과학연구
2008
.06
역사수상-임오년에 다시 보는 120년 전의 '임오군란'
김정기
역사비평
2002
.09
한국 역사 교과서인가, 아니면 일본 역사 교과서인가? : 교학사 한국사 교과서 일제강점기 서술 비판
이준식
역사비평
2013
.11
식민지근대화론의 주요 주장의 실증적 검토
허수열
내일을 여는 역사
2015
.06
일제강점기 해외 풍자만화를 통해 구축된 조선의 표상 -대한제국 시기를 중심으로-
김종옥
만화애니메이션 연구
2022
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090936770