메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전은주 (헌법재판소 헌법연구관)
저널정보
서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 Journal of Korean Law Journal of Korean Law Vol.23 No.1
발행연도
2024.2
수록면
77 - 100 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Constitutional Court of Korea, endowed with extensive authority and enjoying substantial support from the public, handles a wide range of cases. Since it is nearly impossible for the small group of nine Justices to conduct in-depth investigations and research for each case, the Constitutional Court of Korea employs judicial assistants known as “Rapporteur Judges”. Rapporteur Judges are public officials who are specially appointed to conduct investigations and legal research related to case deliberations and judgments under the direction of the Court’s president. Although the Rapporteur Judge system was established when the Court was founded, initially only a few individuals served as Rapporteur Judges. However, the Constitutional Court Act and internal regulations have undergone several reforms to increase the number of employed Rapporteur Judges and provide long-term career prospects. As a result, the current Rapporteur Judge system of the Constitutional Court of Korea operates in a unique manner, granting individual Rapporteur Judges a certain level of independence in their tasks. Rapporteur Judges have become more permanent positions, and their recruitment is decided collaboratively with the involvement of all the Justices and Senior Rapporteur Judges. Furthermore, Rapporteur Judges are not exclusively assigned to a specific Justice and have the obligation and authority to present their independent conclusions on cases to the Justices, even if they differ from the Justice’s perspective. While it is difficult to determine the ideal judicial assistant system, the current Korean Rapporteur Judge system offers distinct advantages that contribute to the Court’s performance, as well as challenges. The job security, the collaborative reporting process, and the guarantee of independence allow the Rapporteur Judges to develop their expertise, which contributes greatly to the constitutional adjudication progress. Yet the inherent limitation of the position prevents them from taking a more proactive role and the bureaucratic nature of the organization discourages Justices from conveying their own views on the decisions. The case of the Korean experience exemplifies that the Justices and the president of the Constitutional Court shall count, in particular, on the collaboration with their assistants to carry out their institutional duties, and more extensive research must be carried out on the role of the Rapporteur Judges, as they play a crucial part in constitutional adjudication and fundamental right protection.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0