메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신상근 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국중등영어교육학회 중등영어교육 중등영어교육 제17권 제1호
발행연도
2024.2
수록면
137 - 155 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study critically analyzed English section of College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) in terms of validity, authenticity, washback, practicality, and item difficulty. It further proposed directions for reform. The section, due to its multiple-choice format, fails to assess test takers’ ability to use English effectively, resulting in low authenticity. Its validity is also compromised because it attempts to indirectly evaluate speaking and writing skills. The positive changes proposed by Ministry of Education when transitioning the test from norm-referenced testing to an absolute scoring system did not materialize. The listening section fails to discriminate candidates’ listening abilities, while the readability and vocabulary levels of the reading passages were much higher than those of the passages in the English II textbook, which is defined as the target level. Lastly, there is an issue with the fixed question format, which makes test items susceptible to test-wiseness techniques. This paper proposes that English education scholars and teachers should play a more proactive role by offering alternatives to Ministry of Education and policy makers, and by teaching and assessing productive skills in the classroom to create an environment where productive skills can also be tested in this high-stakes test.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0