메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
저널정보
대외경제정책연구원 [KIEP] KIEP Opinions KIEP Opinions 제272권
발행연도
2023.9
수록면
1 - 4 (0page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Digital platforms have played a crucial role in fostering a platform economy. Our high dependence on digital platforms makes us think about the right level of regulation for them. The U.S. competition authorities and Congress have paid attention to killer acquisitions because of their negative impacts on competition in the U.S. digital platform market. The main interest of digital platforms is to develop the company's core technology, and the acquisition of startups is sometimes seen as a means to replace internal R&D. By acquiring promising startups, R&D projects can secure adequate funding in a shorter time, and gain the advantage of being a market leader. For this reason, GAFAM have strengthened their existing businesses by acquiring startups in high-tech industries. Antitrust regulators and governments have recently paid more attention to the ever-increasing market power of digital platforms in an effort to better understand how digital markets work and promote competition. As a result, the need to regulate many corporate activities, including 'killer acquisitions' by large digital platforms, is being raised, and the direction that regulation takes will have a significant impact on the business strategies of digital platforms and the performance of the platform economy in the future. It is generally characterized by no or low prices on the user side. Because most of GAFAM's M&A transactions do not begin to monetize only until after a large user base has been acquired, they are not challenged by the revenue criteria traditionally used by antitrust authorities in merger investigations. Therefore, in order to regulate corporate behavior, such as killer acquisitions, that restricts competition in the digital platform market, it is necessary to use innovation performance indicators such as patents. Furthermore, a change in mindset is needed in which the digital platform directly bears the burden of proving restraints of competition, rather than the antitrust authorities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0