Comparison of admission GCS score to admission GCS-P and FOUR scores for prediction of outcomes among patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit in India

Agrawal Nishant; Iyer Shivakumar S; Patil Vishwanath; Kulkarni Sampada; Shah Jignesh N; Jedge Prashant

doi:10.4266/acc.2023.00570

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Agrawal Nishant (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India) Iyer Shivakumar S (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India) Patil Vishwanath (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India) Kulkarni Sampada (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India) Shah Jignesh N (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India) Jedge Prashant (Department of Critical Care Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth (DTU) Medical College and Hospital Pune India)

저널정보: 대한중환자의학회 Acute and Critical Care Acute and Critical Care 제38권 제2호

발행연도: 2023.5

수록면: 226 - 233 (8page)

DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.00570

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Background This study aimed to determine the predictive power of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and the Glasgow Coma Scale Pupil (GCS-P) score in determining outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate patients at 1 month and 6 months after the injury. Methods We conducted a 15-month prospective observational study. It included 50 TBI patients admitted to the ICU who met our inclusion criteria. We used Pearson's correlation coefficient to relate coma scales and outcome measures. The predictive value of these scales was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calculating the area under the curve with a 99% confidence interval. All hypotheses were two-tailed, and significance was defined as P<0.01. Results In the present study, the GCS-P and FOUR scores among all patients on admission as well as in the subset of patients who were mechanically ventilated were statistically significant and strongly correlated with patient outcomes. The correlation coefficient of the GCS score compared to GCS-P and FOUR scores was higher and statistically significant. The areas under the ROC curve for the GCS, GCS-P, and FOUR scores and the number of computed tomography abnormalities were 0.912, 0.905, 0.937, and 0.324, respectively. Conclusions The GCS, GCS-P, and FOUR scores are all excellent predictors with a strong positive linear correlation with final outcome prediction. In particular, the GCS score has the best correlation with final outcome.

#FOUR score #Glasgow Coma Scale #Glasgow Coma Scale Pupil #Glasgow Outcome Scale #traumatic brain injury

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!