메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第166輯
발행연도
2023.6
수록면
195 - 228 (34page)
DOI
10.18622/kher.2023.06.166.195

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to focus on ‘Legitimate Nations’ that North Korean history education has emphasized since 2013 and to review the problem with the system of Korean history reflected into it. Legitimate nations cited as those which undertook the leading role in developing Korean history refer to Gojoseon, Goguryeo, Balhae, Goryeo, and Joseon. The current North Korean history education became the backbone of the history of legitimate nations. It is said that the realm and culture of legitimate nations have continued the tradition, centered around Pyeongyang. The main axis of the tradition was Goguryeo. The lineage of legitimate nations was introduced, centered around Goguryeo. The term legitimate nations was found in the late 2000s. Goguryeo, as the main axis of legitimate nations, began to be gradually emphasized since the late 1950s, thus establishing the theory of the Three Korean Ancient Kingdoms Period, centered around Goguryeo in the early 1980s. The theory of it conferred the legitimacy of national history to Pyeongyang. Amid the national division, they say that the legitimacy of national history was passed down to North Korea which designated Pyeongyang as the capital. The culmination of the legitimacy was Kim Il-seong. The legitimacy of national history justified Kim Jeong-il’s succession of political power. The current history education emphasizes legitimate nations. Those nations secured, as the unitary system of Korean history, the legitimacy of national history conferred to Pyeongyang. Now, Kim Jeong-il’s succession of political power is justified, based on the legitimacy. Legitimacy is formed as unitary linage of single subject. The single subject of legitimacy is given homogeneity but the outsiders of unitary linkage are excluded. North Korea’s legitimate nations plainly show it. The main target of the exclusion is none other than South Korea. The legitimate nations that North Korean history education emphasizes are in reflection of the reality of national division. It is considered that the recent dispute over the legitimacy of Republic of Korea or Provisional Government must give attention to this reality.

목차

1. 序言
2. 『2013 교육강령』에 보이는 정통국가 중심의 한국사 체계
3. 신라 삼국통일론의 변화와 고구려 중심의 삼국시대론 정립
4. 평양에 부여한 민족사의 정통성과 정치권력의 평양 정통론
5. 結語: 평양 정통론과 역사교육의 분단
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-374-001739981