지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The tense obstruents dealt with in this paper are /pˈ, tˈ, kˈ, sˈ/ which developed before the end of the 15th century and made the cosonant system virtually the same as that of present-day Korean. When the Korean alphabet was invented in 1443, /sˈ/ already existed. The most plausible hypothesis for the development of /sˈ/ is that it has developed as initial geminate /ss/ from #sVsV due to syncope of the first vowel. It is supposed that /pˈ, tˈ, kˈ/ have developed as geminates /pp, tt, kk/ from the clusters /sp, st, sk/, respectively, initial ones during the second half of the 15th century, and medial ones towards the end of the 15th century, which dates are estimated in this paper. The most important aim of the paper is to explain the change of the clusters /sp, st, sk/ into /pp, tt, kk/. Let us begin with the medial ones. The syllable-final /s/ changed into /t/ in the early 16th century, so the series of intervocalic changes /sp, st, sk/＞/tp, tt, tk/＞/pp, tt, kk/ appear to be beyond question. The first is the syllable-final change /s/＞/t/ and the second is place assimilation. For example, /əskəj/＞/ətkəj/＞/əkkəj/ ‘shoulder" looks as if perfect. However, the syllable-final change /s/＞/t/ raises a big question, since, as a one-step change, [s]＞[t ̚] is not understandable. So I have set up [st ̚] as an intermediate stage in a previous paper. Thus the syllable-final change in question, I think, is [s]＞[st ̚]＞[t ̚]. The [st ̚] is not a cluster but a complex segment that begins as a fricative and ends as an unreleased stop. Now I set up [st ̚] also for the change of the medial clusters /sp, st, sk/ into /pp, tt, kk/. This change can be represented as (1), and the syllable-final change /s/＞/t/ as(2).
(1) a. [sp]＞[st ̚p]＞[spp]＞[pp]
b. [st]＞[st ̚t]＞[tt]
c. [sk]＞[st ̚k]＞[skk]＞[kk]
(2) a. [sp]＞[st ̚p]＞[tp]
b. [st]＞[st ̚t]＞[tt]
c. [sk]＞[st ̚k]＞[tk]
d. [s]＞[st ̚]＞[t ̚] (before a pause)
Roughly speaking, (1) represents the case of intra-morphemic clusters and (2) the case of inter-morphemic ones. In (1) the stop part of [st ̚] underwent place assimilation, but in (2) the assimilation was blocked by morpheme boundaries or there was no trigger. It is naturally supposed that (1) and (2) were initiated together but (2) was completed later than (1) because in the case of (2) deletion of [s] was delayed due to the influence of [s] of pre-vocalic allomorphs. Needless to say, this order cannot be compatible with the above-mentioned series of changes /sp, st, sk/＞/tp, tt, tk/＞/pp, tt, kk/ There is supporting evidence. That is, spellings that are in accord with the above supposition are found in documents of the early 16th century, which fact is presented for the first time in this paper. Now we can believe the reality of the complex segment [st ̚] set up by me. Thus there is no reason to think that the initial clusters /sp, st, sk/ have changed into /pp, tt, kk/ in a different way from (1).
(1) a. [sp]＞[st ̚p]＞[spp]＞[pp]
b. [st]＞[st ̚t]＞[tt]
c. [sk]＞[st ̚k]＞[skk]＞[kk]
(2) a. [sp]＞[st ̚p]＞[tp]
b. [st]＞[st ̚t]＞[tt]
c. [sk]＞[st ̚k]＞[tk]
d. [s]＞[st ̚]＞[t ̚] (before a pause)
Roughly speaking, (1) represents the case of intra-morphemic clusters and (2) the case of inter-morphemic ones. In (1) the stop part of [st ̚] underwent place assimilation, but in (2) the assimilation was blocked by morpheme boundaries or there was no trigger. It is naturally supposed that (1) and (2) were initiated together but (2) was completed later than (1) because in the case of (2) deletion of [s] was delayed due to the influence of [s] of pre-vocalic allomorphs. Needless to say, this order cannot be compatible with the above-mentioned series of changes /sp, st, sk/＞/tp, tt, tk/＞/pp, tt, kk/ There is supporting evidence. That is, spellings that are in accord with the above supposition are found in documents of the early 16th century, which fact is presented for the first time in this paper. Now we can believe the reality of the complex segment [st ̚] set up by me. Thus there is no reason to think that the initial clusters /sp, st, sk/ have changed into /pp, tt, kk/ in a different way from (1).
목차
1. 머리말
2. 어두의 된소리 ‘ㅆ’의 발달
3. ‘ㅅ’계 합용병서도 본래 자음군 표기였다
4. 어두 자음군 ‘ㅅㄱ, ㅅㄷ, ㅅㅂ’의 된소리화
5. 어중 자음군 ‘ㅅㄱ, ㅅㄷ, ㅅㅂ’의 된소리화
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어 유성장애음소 설정과 근거
한민족문화연구
2015 .02
-
한국어 TTS 경음화 발음의 국어학적 점검
한말연구
2019 .01
-
강도 조절 측면의 평가어로 살펴본 영상텍스트의 재번역 분석 ?영화 <원스>의 노래를 중심으로?
통역과 번역
2022 .04
-
영어 시제의 통사적 기능과 의미적 특성
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
시제구분에 대한 논쟁과 제안?영어와 국어를 중심으로?
현대문법연구
2021 .12
-
한국어 학습자의 평폐쇄음 뒤 경음화 실현 양상 및 교육 방안에 대한 일고찰
이중언어학
2018 .01
-
라오스인 학습자를 위한 한국어 어두초성 장애음 발음 교육 연구
이중언어학
2016 .01
-
한국어 방언의 비음-저해음 관련 현상의 검토
언어학
2020 .12
-
아동 도서 그림책 영한 번역에 나타나는 제목의 구조 : 통시적 양상과 언어학적 고찰
번역학연구
2017 .03
-
短縮語形成に影響する音韻的要因について－重子音における有標性を中心に－
일어일문학연구
2021 .01
-
Ontology of time and relational tense
인문언어
2019 .01
-
아랍어 문법과 꾸란에서 아랍어 동사의 시제와 상
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2022 .12
-
일본어 모국어 화자의 한국어 경음 지각
말소리와 음성과학
2015 .06
-
A Data-based Analysis of Tense Shifts in News Texts
언어학 연구
2019 .04
-
“V過O的”考察
언어와 정보사회
2016 .03
-
우리말 때매김 연구
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
Lengthening and shortening processes in Korean
말소리와 음성과학
2020 .09
-
학령전기 아동의 시간 개념 이해도에 따른 시제 이해와 발달의 경향
언어
2020 .09
-
서정시제(시의 현재시제)의 실제와 특성 고찰
한국현대문학연구
2021 .08
-
Durational aspects of Korean nasal geminates
말소리와 음성과학
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0