메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
홍대식 (서강대학교)
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제32권
발행연도
2015.11
수록면
112 - 151 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to raise several issues in practice regarding calculating administrative fine against unreasonable concerted acts based on theoretical approach to the purpose of the imposition of administrative fine and analysis on decisional practice of the Supreme Court of Korea, and seeks for the improvement methods thereto. The main points of this paper can be summarized as follows: Firstly, the purpose of the imposition of administrative fine can be understood as the achievement of optimal level of deterrence through the internalization of social harm. Due to the difficulty of measuring deadweight loss, one of the components of social harm, the practical method is to estimate the scale of illegal gains with which the amount of administrative fine is reviewed about whether or not it is balanced. Secondly, the base amount of the fine against unreasonable concerted acts is calculated by multiplying the relevant turnover of a violator by a prescribed imposition rate. This so-called relevant turnover-based method is set up as the proxy for simplifying the calculation mechanism of the administrative fine. Therefore, in calculating the relevant turnover resonable ways should be applied to make sure that the calculated amount by a normal imposition rate shall be an amount corresponding to the purpose of the imposition of fine. Thirdly, the Supreme Court of Korea regards a factor of goods included in contents of agreement as important for its judgment of the scope of the relevant goods required for the relevant turnover. Based on the precedents of the Supreme Court, several factors can be identified as those to be taken into account for whether the scope of the relevant goods can be extended to other goods than those included in contents of agreement as those affected by the violation directly or indirectly. Fourthly, for the purpose of the assessment of the severity of a violation by which the imposition rate is determined, a fining methodology should be developed which takes into account object-based assessment factors and effects-based assessment factors equally. Lastly, in case that there are special circumstances under which optimal amount of fine cannot be calculated by the current system adopted by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (‘KFTC’) at the adjustment stage in spite of no or little illegal gains, it is required that the KFTC should set the imposition rate reasonably at the base amount determination stage considering the scale of illegal gains or industrial and market factors affecting such.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0