메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김서림 (경남대학교)
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제17권 제6호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
159 - 179 (21page)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.16980/jitc.17.6.202112.159

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose The purpose of this study aims to analyze the determination of the governing law in the UK when there is no designation of the governing law in the arbitration agreement in Enca v. Chubb. Design/Methodology/Approach In order to analyze Enca v. Chubb, this study adopts a literature analysis that analyzes various precedents on the determination of the governing law. Findings The UK Supreme Court determined the law governing the underlying contract by applying the closest connection test. Since there was no choice of law governing the contract, the law governing the arbitration agreement had to be determined by applying the closest connection test, and in that regard, London, as the seat of arbitration, was considered a close connection in that determination. Accordingly, English law was determined as the law governing the arbitration agreement, and although the UK Supreme Court adopted different reasoning, it upheld the anti-suit injunction passed by the UK Court of Appeal. Research Implications The Supreme Court’s decision provides much-needed clarification regarding the English legal approach to determining the governing law of an arbitration agreement. Although the majority ultimately upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision, it did so by a taking a different route and affirmed the choice-of-law approach previously set forth by authorities. The Supreme Court also displayed remarkable sensitivity to the provisions of the New York Convention, and demonstrated admirable receptivity to international authorities, with both the majority and dissents relying on an expansive range of international commentary and judicial decisions

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (64)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0