메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ahram Yi (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Jun Hyung Lee (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Gahyun Yoo (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Hye Jin Lim (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Euna Park (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Jungsun Han (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Geun Young Kim (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Sung-Eun Cho (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Sang Gon Lee (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs)) Eun Hee Lee (Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs))
저널정보
대한임상검사정도관리협회 Journal of Laboratory Medicine And Quality Assurance Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 제43권 제3호
발행연도
2021.9
수록면
162 - 165 (4page)
DOI
10.15263/jlmqa.2021.43.3.162

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We validated a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for quantifying pristanic acid (PrA) and phytanic acid (PhA) in plasma specimens. We developed a GC-MS method based on the analysis of 20 μM 2H3-pristanic acid (PrA-IS) and 80 μM 2H3-phytanic acid (PhA-IS) as internal standards. The GC-MS was fitted with a 30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm HP-5MS (Agilent, USA) column. The mass spectrometer was operated through the transitions from the precursor to the product ions (m/z [mass-to-charge ratio] 355, 369, 358, and 372 for PrA, PhA, PrA-IS, and PhA-IS, respectively). The retention times of PrA, PhA, PrA-IS, and PhA-IS were 19.33, 20.39, 19.31, and 20.38 minutes in a 26.83-minute analysis, respectively. Linearity, recovery, precision, and carryover were evaluated to validate the method. The GC-MS method yielded a linear response from 0.032 to 9.951 μmol/L for PrA (R 2=0.9999) and from 0.127 to 39.432 μmol/L for PhA (R 2=0.9998). The limits of quantification by the methods were 0.032 μmol/L for PrA and 0.127 μmol/L for PhA. The recovery of PrA and PhA GC-MS method measurements were within ±10% when evaluated with external quality assessment materials. The within-batch and total coefficients of variation were all below 6% for both PrA and PhA test results. Twenty-interday imprecision (%) were all below 5% for both PrA and PhA test results. Carry-over was found to be 0.001% for PrA and ?0.008% for PhA. The GC-MS PrA and PhA assay showed adequate recovery, precision, sensitivity, and linearity. Hence, it is suitable for routine clinical work.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0