메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Choi Nam-Kyong (Department of Health Convergence Ewha Womans University Seoul Korea.) Shantakumar Sumitra (Epidemiology and Health Economics Greater China) Kim Mi-Sook (Department of Preventive Medicine Seoul National University Seoul Korea.) Lee Chang-Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea.) Cheng Wendy Y (Analysis Group Inc. Boston MA USA.) Bobbili Priyanka (Analysis Group Inc. Boston MA USA.) Yang Bo Ram (Medical Research Collaborating Center Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea.) Lee Joongyub (Department of Prevention and Management Inha University Hospital School of Medicine Inha University) Hinds David (Real World Evidence and Epidemiology GlaxoSmithKline plc. Collegeville PA USA.) Duh Mei Sheng (Analysis Group Inc. Boston MA USA.) Korves Caroline (Analysis Group Inc. Boston MA USA.) Park Heung-Woo (Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Korea.)
저널정보
대한천식알레르기학회(구 대한알레르기학회) Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Vol.14 No.2
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
220 - 232 (13page)
DOI
10.4168/aair.2022.14.2.220

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Although asthma treatment guidelines recommend regular inhaled medication, real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in South Korea have not been examined. We examined real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients treated for asthma in South Korea. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the South Korean National Health Insurance database (2013?2016). Newly treated patients with asthma aged ≥18 years without history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included. Initial and maintenance medication prescriptions were examined. Treatment discontinuation and switch were described. Asthma exacerbation rates, poor asthma control, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) were compared between maintenance treatment groups (inhaled versus oral) using adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and hazard ratios (aHR). Results: Overall, 1,054,707 patients initiated any asthma medication; 37,868 patients initiated inhaled (n = 9,983, 26.4%) or oral (n = 27,885, 73.6%) maintenance medication. More patients initiating inhaled versus oral asthma medication discontinued treatment within 12 months (94.4% vs. 86.3%; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with inhaled and oral medication switched treatment (2.5% and 2.3%; P = 0.4160, respectively). Patients initiating inhaled medication had significantly lower rates of asthma exacerbation (aIRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39?0.69), lack of asthma control (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48?0.62; P < 0.0001), all-cause and asthma-related HRU versus oral medication. Conclusions: Despite current asthma guidelines, more patients in South Korea were prescribed oral than inhaled medications, resulting in suboptimal asthma management and increased HRU. This study highlights the need to reduce oral corticosteroid prescriptions for optimized treatment in asthma management.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0