메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
최재헌 (목원대학교) 이재우 (목원대학교)
저널정보
한국지역개발학회 한국지역개발학회 학술대회 한국지역개발학회 2022년 추계학술대회
발행연도
2022.11
수록면
504 - 513 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to objectively derive the importance of system improvement factors to be considered in the operation of the adjustment calculation system by grasping the perceptions of the two groups of experts who calculate adjustments. The space range was for the entire country, including the metropolitan area, Chungcheong area, Jeolla area, Gyeongsang area, and Gangwon area. The time range is limited to 2022. The subjects of the analysis study were public officials and appraisers who were the subjects of calculating the adjustment amount. For analysis, AHP, a multidimensional decision-making method, was applied, and the relative importance of each system improvement factor was identified for each group. The results of the study are as follows. Group 1 and Group 2 of experts commonly recognized the importance of detailed indicators of appraisal, appraisal principles, and criteria after boundary determination in the top nine indicators considering the complex weighted average. However, the expert group 1 and the expert group 2 showed differences in detailed first-stage indicators, second-stage indicators, and third-stage indicators, confirming a large difference in perception of important issues. This study suggests that overall institutional regulations such as procedural rationality of evaluating intellectual reinvestigation adjustment funds and appraisal standards need to be systematized and clarified for administrative procedures, residents" satisfaction, civil complaints, and appropriate appraisal. However, despite the expert group"s perception survey, a sufficient survey was not conducted based on the status survey to derive the system improvement plan, and there is a limit to the study that an alternative to system improvement could not be derived through close legal review and comparative analysis.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 제도 및 선행연구 고찰
3. 연구 방법 및 설계
4. AHP를 이용한 제도개선 우선순위 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0