메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Countermeasures of River Project Transfer to Local Governments
Recommendations
Search
Questions

하천사업 지방이양에 따른 경기도의 대응방안

논문 기본 정보

Type
Research report
Author
이기영 (경기연구원) 백경오 (한경대학교) 한송희 (경기연구원)
Journal
Gyeonggi Research Institute 정책연구 [정책연구 2021-77]
Published
2021.11
Pages
1 - 92 (92page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Countermeasures of River Project Transfer to Local Governments
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
There have been dramatic changes in river projects since Korean government decided that it would stop supporting funds on river projects of local governments. Local governments should make plans and execute river projects on their own.
Recently Gyeonggi-do has made a master plan of river training works that contain new river training works, small scale projects, demo projects and public contest projects. Ecological stream projects in Gyeonggi-do would continue in spite of no funds from Korean government.
According to survey of local governments’ officials, 74% of respondents worry of security of budget. 56% of respondents say that flood control is the most important field in river projects. On the other hand, recently Korean government insists that ecological field should be stressed in river projects.
Recently decision makers and politicians have shown great interests on rivers. They want to make use of rivers as local garden or national garden. It is expected that rivers could be an important issue for local governments. Small scale river projects such as trail, bike lane or stank destruction could be exemplary cases of river project transfer to local governments, which Gyeonggi-do is going to execute. Gyeonggi-do is trying to various attempts on river projects, making use of demo projects and public contest projects.
There expected to be controversial issues such as making bike lane or sports facility. To solve those problems, Gyeonggi-do should urge Cities to make watershed governance that consists of experts, residents, civic groups and officials. In addition, river organizations of local governments should be adjusted to make river projects efficiently.

Contents

[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 하천사업 현황과 여건 변화]
1. 경기도의 하천사업 추진 현황
2. 하천사업 지방이양에 따른 여건 변화
3. 설문조사 및 문제점 분석
[제3장 경기도 하천사업 추진방안]
1. 하천사업 추진 방향
2. 하천사업 자연성 회복 방안
3. 하천사업 추진전략
[제4장 하천사업 추진체계 구축]
1. 법·제도적 개선방안
2. 하천 관련 조직 개편방안
[제5장 결론 및 정책제안]
1. 결론
2. 정책 제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-309-000109906