메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kyung Ju Lo (동덕여자대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.58 No.2
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
169 - 189 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay attempts to reevaluate Coriolanus by examining his actions and behaviors across a set of virtues from Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle’s virtues, moral and intellectual virtues, are used frequently to gauge leadership qualities in men of public power because of their masculine and secular nature. To that end, a close analysis reveals a courageous and proud man who has the moral and intellectual fortitude necessary to gain respect as a leader. Coriolanus presents the audience with a rapid pace of events whereby all the characters find themselves in situations in which they must commit themselves to speak and act in accordance with their virtue ethics. When faced with situations that are inverse to their self-serving needs, all the characters with the exception of Coriolanus are malleable in their exercise of virtues to advantageously serve their needs. Coriolanus, despite the “slippery turns” (4.4.17) of events presented to him, does not gauge the outcome and stays true to virtues he deems most worthy. He stays constant throughout the play and does not shirk from exercising virtues even when the consequences work against him. In fact, his uncompromising allegiance to virtuosity leads him to “a world elsewhere” (3.3.165) where his virtues can be manifested with no hindrance and he can continue to be the “author of himself” (5.4.40). For Coriolanus, being virtuous in “the world elsewhere” (3.3.165) is more worthwhile as he believes that “a brave death outweighs a bad life” (1.6.90).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0