메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주기화 (건국대)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제59호
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
463 - 487 (25page)
DOI
10.29324/jewcl.2022.3.59.463

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Employing Donna Haraway’s futurism as a critical lens, this paper surveys why and how the MaddAddamites in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam destroy the world by colluding to create a pandemic. The essay begins by analyzing the techno-apocalyptic beliefs and hopes of Atwood’s futurists, and traces the foundation of the anti-ecological “Church of PetrOleum” and “God’s Gardeners” back to Descartes’ dualism and the discourse of church-capital-science as a collusive construct. Thereafter, the paper explores how Atwood sets up annihilation as a response to the experience of despair, widespread among the futurists. Finally, the paper explores the novel’s descent into inevitability, and how this manifests as a collective inability to engage positive solutions, compounded by a politics of indifference. Reading in these ways, the text can be our roadmap toward sympoietic cooperation for, even, multispecies resurgence. Atwood’s novel asserts annihilation as the response power has to global emergencies (such as the current Covid-19 pandemic); Atwood’s futurists rewrite the self-indulgent and self-fulfilling myths of apocalypse, and succumb to wishful thinking by hoping for technological fixes to the symptomologies of deeper complexities. Her work serves as a warning that futurism, often misunderstood as an alternative, is not only never the solution, but indeed a destructive path that can lead to annihilation. This paper asks if we might in fact be tantamount to Atwood’s futurists: what is to be done in our age of the global pandemic, an age of mass death and extinction?

목차

ABSTRACT
I. 서론
II. 미래주의자들의 기술 묵시록적 믿음과 희망
III. 미래주의자들의 절망이 선택한 절멸의 힘
IV. 미래주의자들의 사유 무능력과 무관심의 정치
V. 결론
Works Cited

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-001613483