메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Noh, Aegyung (Korea University)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제35권 제1호
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
83 - 107 (25page)
DOI
10.29163/jmed.2022.4.35.1.83

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper locates Patrick Shanley’s Doubt: A Parable in the context of a series of modern plays, which problematize accusation and its factual basis through their peculiar uses of the realist convention of revelation. Following suit from Lillian Hellman’s The Children’s Hour and David Mamet’s Oleanna which dramatize the accusations made at school, Doubt makes an issue of verifying the factual foundation of an accusation but sets itself apart from the two predecessors by its idiosyncratic abandonment of ‘the scenic’ portion of factual clues. Between ‘the scenic’ and ‘the verbal’ constituents of performative semiotics in the theatre, such abandonment leaves behind ‘the verbal’—the semantics of the languages of characters surrounding an accusation—as the only available source of reference for the audience’s moral judgement. The objective of this paper is to examine the mimetic politics of Doubt—its removal of ‘scenic’ clues that the audience can actually ‘see’ and consequent restriction of their resource to ‘the verbal’—and by doing that, align the play with its realist precursors. Its main argument is that Shanley conceives the postmodern unknowability through the scenic ‘atrophy’ or ‘exhaustion’ of fact, with the result that the whole game of accusation is locked within the fundamentally dissatisfying ‘semantic’ level. The paper finds this aesthetic choice by Shanley setting him apart from Hellman’s and Mamet’s strategies of revelation.

목차

I. Introduction: Fact vs. Accusation, and What We See in Realism
II. What We Doubt and ‘See’
III. What We Doubt and ‘Hear’
IV. Conclusion: A Verdict
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-842-001331686