지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.5
- 수록면
- 41 - 62 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2022.5.33.2.41
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On May 25, 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) unanimously passed the 11th Amendment (ICD-11) of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD), which classifies gaming disorder as diseases at the 72nd General Assembly B Committee in Geneva, Switzerland. Following the WHO"s decision, there was a fierce debate between the medical community and the game industry over whether this would be reflected in the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases(KCD) organized by Statistics Korea.
Although discussions related to game overindulgence have existed for a long time, research on regulatory policies when gaming disorder is introduced in Korea is insufficient because it is the first time that gaming disorder has been officially classified as a disease. On the other hand, the most basic policy in regulating specific industries is to impose monetary obligations such as taxes and levies. Therefore, this study analyzes the financial regulatory policies currently in place with the tobacco and liquor industries, which are registered as disease codes in the ICD and are subject to many regulatory policies, and presents the possibility and problems of financial regulations for the game industry.
Since the introduction of ICD is not compulsory, it is not necessary for Member States to accept it. However, the situation is different when ICD is introduced in Korea and gaming disorder are registered in KCD. KCD is publicly notified by the head of the Statistics Korea under the authority of the Statistics Act and is legally binding. In the end, the introduction of gaming disorder in Korea is likely to bring about changes in the overall medical and insurance-related industries and justify regulations on the game industry.
The registration of disease code for gaming disorder has a legal problem in that it violates the principle of clarity, equality, and proportionality. Among the diagnostic criteria for game use disorder, the expression "negative result" and the scope of "game" are unclear, which violates the principle of clarity. In addition, ICD-11 violates the principle of equality in that it contains only games among various digital media. Finally, the registration of the disease code of gaming disorder violates the principle of proportionality because it does not meet the legitimacy of the purpose, the minimum of damage, and the balance of legal interests.
Regulations are becoming stronger, with taxes and levies imposed on the tobacco and liquor industries steadily increasing. Tobacco and alcohol are also listed on the ICD, and games can also be subject to taxation because they have always been subject to regulation, such as games. Taxation on games and the tobacco and liquor industries is generally an inductive and coordinative tax to achieve the specific purpose of promoting the health of the people rather than for the purpose of preparing the national financial income. In other words, such taxes require stricter constitutional legitimacy than financial taxes, and there is a problem in that regulations on games do not meet this legitimacy, and such regulations have insufficient correction functions. In addition, in the case of game-related levies, in light of the national health promotion levy of cigarettes, it is unlikely to be used according to the original purpose of the levy.
Although discussions related to game overindulgence have existed for a long time, research on regulatory policies when gaming disorder is introduced in Korea is insufficient because it is the first time that gaming disorder has been officially classified as a disease. On the other hand, the most basic policy in regulating specific industries is to impose monetary obligations such as taxes and levies. Therefore, this study analyzes the financial regulatory policies currently in place with the tobacco and liquor industries, which are registered as disease codes in the ICD and are subject to many regulatory policies, and presents the possibility and problems of financial regulations for the game industry.
Since the introduction of ICD is not compulsory, it is not necessary for Member States to accept it. However, the situation is different when ICD is introduced in Korea and gaming disorder are registered in KCD. KCD is publicly notified by the head of the Statistics Korea under the authority of the Statistics Act and is legally binding. In the end, the introduction of gaming disorder in Korea is likely to bring about changes in the overall medical and insurance-related industries and justify regulations on the game industry.
The registration of disease code for gaming disorder has a legal problem in that it violates the principle of clarity, equality, and proportionality. Among the diagnostic criteria for game use disorder, the expression "negative result" and the scope of "game" are unclear, which violates the principle of clarity. In addition, ICD-11 violates the principle of equality in that it contains only games among various digital media. Finally, the registration of the disease code of gaming disorder violates the principle of proportionality because it does not meet the legitimacy of the purpose, the minimum of damage, and the balance of legal interests.
Regulations are becoming stronger, with taxes and levies imposed on the tobacco and liquor industries steadily increasing. Tobacco and alcohol are also listed on the ICD, and games can also be subject to taxation because they have always been subject to regulation, such as games. Taxation on games and the tobacco and liquor industries is generally an inductive and coordinative tax to achieve the specific purpose of promoting the health of the people rather than for the purpose of preparing the national financial income. In other words, such taxes require stricter constitutional legitimacy than financial taxes, and there is a problem in that regulations on games do not meet this legitimacy, and such regulations have insufficient correction functions. In addition, in the case of game-related levies, in light of the national health promotion levy of cigarettes, it is unlikely to be used according to the original purpose of the levy.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 논의의 기초
Ⅲ. 게임이용장애 질병코드 등재의 법적 문제점
Ⅳ. 게임이용장애 질병코드 등재의 법정책적 문제점 : 금전부담의무 부과를 중심으로
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
게임이용장애 질병코드의 국내 수용에 관련된 법적 문제점 고찰
한양법학
2024 .08
-
“게임 이용행위”의 질병적 취급의 문제점에 관한 고찰
법과 정책연구
2019 .01
-
정책행위자에 대한 인식이 규제정책수용성에 미치는 영향: 게임이용장애 인식의 조절효과를 중심으로
국정관리연구
2020 .01
-
WHO의 게임이용 장애 질병코드 부여 관련 법정책의 방향
언론과법
2020 .04
-
게임이용장애 질병분류가 게임이용자의 태도와 게임의향에 미치는 효과
벤처창업연구
2020 .08
-
WHO 게임 이용 장애 질병 코드화의 의미와 과제
법학연구
2020 .03
-
전문가들의 판단에 미치는 요인 연구: 게임이용장애 질병코드화를 중심으로
한국심리학회지: 건강
2020 .01
-
청소년 게임중독의 의료화 현상에 대한 연구
미래사회
2023 .06
-
게임산업 활성화를 위한 법정책적 연구
한양법학
2023 .02
-
게임 이용 장애 질병코드 도입이 일반적인 게임 이용자, 게임 광고, 게임 산업 태도에 미치는 영향: 편견과 사회적 낙인 인식의 효과 검증을 중심으로
융합사회와 공공정책
2019 .01
-
게임 질병코드 도입에 따른 게임 이용장애인에 대한 낙인효과: 일반인의 자아 개념과 문화 차원의 성향을 중심으로
헬스커뮤니케이션연구
2020 .01
-
온라인 게임의 종류와 승패가 게임에 대한 자기통제와 중독에 미치는 영향
인터넷전자상거래연구
2018 .12
-
게임 이용행위의 질병적 취급에 헌법적 검토
법과 정책연구
2019 .01
-
게임 기기 다양성이 중학생의 게임 과의존에 미치는 영향: 게임 사용시간과 성별의 조절된 매개효과를 중심으로
한국심리학회지: 건강
2022 .03
-
대리게임금지법에 관한 비판적 검토
法學論文集
2019 .01
-
게임을 이용하는 동기에 따른 소비자 유형 구분과 유형별 차이
소비자학연구
2019 .01
-
게임 이용동기, 게임 효능감, 게임 규범성 및 게임 인식이 게임선용에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 : 다층모형 분석을 중심으로
한국언론정보학보
2019 .12
-
MMORPG 이용자들의 게임 이용 동기와 인터넷 게임 중독의 사이에서 게임 내 행동의 매개 효과
한국심리학회지: 건강
2018 .01
-
청소년들의 학교따돌림 피해 위험과 인터넷게임장애 위험의 연관성: 성별차이 중심으로
한국학교보건학회지
2018 .01
-
한국판 ICD-11 성격장애 심각도 평가 (PDS-ICD-11)의 타당화
한국심리학회지: 건강
2023 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0