메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김현정 (한국외국어대학교) 이주승 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 영미연구 영미연구 제35권
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
205 - 233 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Previous research on L2 writing assessment has tended to focus on quantitative analyses of ratings assigned by raters/teachers. Different from previous research, the present study aimed to examine the linguistic features in test-takers’ written responses across different writing task types, focusing on those used for coherence and cohesion in writing. A total of 143 adult EFL learners were presented with two types of writing-compare/contrast and problem/solution-and they were required to write a 300-word essay on one type of their choice. Their written responses (70 compare/contrast and 73 problem/solution) were analyzed using Coh-Metrix to compare the linguistic differences between the two types of writing. Two raters who evaluated both types of writing were further interviewed to examine their perceptions about the discourse organization of the two types. The results indicated that the two types of written responses showed linguistic differences mostly in referential cohesion (e.g., overlap). However, neither of the raters considered referential cohesion when scoring discourse organization; consequently, the use of referential cohesion by the compare/contrast writing group was not reflected in the ratings. The study also suggests the need to consider the time restrictions and task effects on test-takers’ relative difficulty in organizing discourse.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0