메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
유진열 (성결대학교)
저널정보
한국복음주의신학회 성경과 신학 성경과 신학 제76권
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
153 - 179 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This thesis aims to analyze Buber's, Tillich's, and Pannenberg's views of alienation and to evaluate them if they do justice to the biblical materials in dealing with sin. It will also assess their position, asking “Are their views empirically verifiable? Do they overemphasize the concept at the expense of the idea of sin as the violation of God's law? Are they successful in relating alienation to the universal nature of sin? Is Jesus Christ appropriately understood in their thoughts?” Thus this thesis attempts to scrutinize them in the light of the Bible, Christology, and experience. The three theologian's views of sin which revolve around the term alienation make contribution to the relevancy of theology, especially in the academic milieu that sees the traditional discourse on sin centered on human relation to God as futile. Their approaches to the subject betray a biblical perspective without which theirs cannot be labeled ‘Christian.’ They hold almost the same Christological view, portraying Jesus as theone who truly overcame the predicament in his relation to the Father. And their empirical stance could help decipher the mystery and universality of sinful reality. On the other hand, they fail to engage themselves first on what the Bible says about sin and its consequences. They tend to move from human situation to revelation, or from the context to the text, and are successful in arriving at their conclusion by hearing what their contemporaries think, not by expositing the related biblical verses. The anthropology from below has certain advantages, but human experience should not be the decisive factor in establishing theological doctrines. Evangelical theologians need to pay attention more to the inerrant Bible than to the mutable points of view based on experience.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0