지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines occurrences of disfluency in simultaneous interpretation between Korean and Japanese; in particular, pauses and hesitation causing fillers and sound lengthening. The subject group consists of four experienced professional interpreters holding a master’s degree in translation from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. In order to identify and analyze pauses and hesitation, they were asked to simultaneously interpret the speakers’ talk at actual international web seminars.
It was found that the frequency and length of pauses were both found more in B-A simultaneous interpretation(Japanese to Korean) than in A-B interpretation(Korean to Japanese), though the difference varies from person and person. As for their hesitation, interestingly enough, the analysis exhibits that fillers were found more in A-B translation, whereas lengthening was more manifested in B-A interpretation.
It was also found that the speakers’ pauses did not directly affect the interpreters’ pauses: it may be assumed that the interpreters were making an effort to balance the overall length of the source text by intentionally including pauses.
As for the common fillers due to the interpreters’ hesitations, ‘え’, ‘あ’, ‘この’, ‘その’ and ‘だから’ appeared in A-B simultaneous interpretation, and ‘어’, ‘아’, ‘이제’ and ‘이런’ appeared in B-A interpretation. The number and location of lengthening differed depending on the interpreter, but the occurrence and location of lengthening were almost the same in simultaneous interpretation A-B and B-A.
It was found that the frequency and length of pauses were both found more in B-A simultaneous interpretation(Japanese to Korean) than in A-B interpretation(Korean to Japanese), though the difference varies from person and person. As for their hesitation, interestingly enough, the analysis exhibits that fillers were found more in A-B translation, whereas lengthening was more manifested in B-A interpretation.
It was also found that the speakers’ pauses did not directly affect the interpreters’ pauses: it may be assumed that the interpreters were making an effort to balance the overall length of the source text by intentionally including pauses.
As for the common fillers due to the interpreters’ hesitations, ‘え’, ‘あ’, ‘この’, ‘その’ and ‘だから’ appeared in A-B simultaneous interpretation, and ‘어’, ‘아’, ‘이제’ and ‘이런’ appeared in B-A interpretation. The number and location of lengthening differed depending on the interpreter, but the occurrence and location of lengthening were almost the same in simultaneous interpretation A-B and B-A.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행연구 분석
3. 연구 대상 및 연구 방법
4. 실험 결과
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
김한식 / 2007 / 신문기사의 문장길이에 관한 한일 비교연구-독이성 제고를 위한 번역전략의 관점에서 / 통번역학연구 10(2):69~83
남길임 / 2011 / 담화 유형에 따른 한국어 비유창성 현상 연구 / 담화와 인지 18(3):115~138
박정윤 / 2004 / 한일 일한 동시통역에서의 시차의 고찰 / 日本語文學 (22):77~96
원종화 / 2010 / 영-한 동시통역 전략의 방향성 연구 / 통역과 번역 12(1):131~155
이태형 / 2012 / 영한 동시통역의 문장 내 과도한 휴지 연구 / 통역과 번역 14(2):197~214
남길임 / 2011 / 담화 유형에 따른 한국어 비유창성 현상 연구 / 담화와 인지 18(3):115~138
박정윤 / 2004 / 한일 일한 동시통역에서의 시차의 고찰 / 日本語文學 (22):77~96
원종화 / 2010 / 영-한 동시통역 전략의 방향성 연구 / 통역과 번역 12(1):131~155
이태형 / 2012 / 영한 동시통역의 문장 내 과도한 휴지 연구 / 통역과 번역 14(2):197~214
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-000131977