메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최경미 (성균관대학교) 지성우 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
경북대학교 IT와 법 연구소 IT와 법연구 IT와 법연구 제14호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
235 - 276 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Autonomous vehicle(AV) is a research topic that needs research in the field of public law. And among them, solving the moral dilemma around the life rights is one of the most important research fields. In this article, the law and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea set out the criteria for the conflict of basic rights of the right to life in matters such as artificial abortion, euthanasia or dignity death, I have tried to analyze it in the light of what it suggests. As a result of the analysis, the following two conclusions were drawn to the dilemma regarding the right to life of autonomous vehicles(AV). First, our Constitution respects self-determination. Therefore, even if a strong artificial intelligence(AI) emerges and transcends human knowledge and judgment, man's autonomy is a prior and natural legal right, so human judgment should always be given precedence. The recent imposition of a 'kill switch' in the EU resolution is in line with my argument that human judgment should prevail. Second, our Constitution, according to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, treats human beings as a purpose and prohibits human beings as means. Therefore, it should be prohibited to assign differential value to human life or to calculate utilitarian way of thinking and cost benefit in the case of autonomous vehicle (AV), especially in the collision of basic right of life. However, our Constitution permits the application of the principle of proportional exception under Article 37.2 of the Constitution even in the case of the collision of basic right of life. Therefore, it can not be said that utilitarianism is totally excluded from the situation of collateral rights. In the end, defining the norms of collision of life rights in a autonomous vehicle (AV) is not a matter of discovery but of human – centered rational choice and decision through social consensus. This paper also summarizes the issues related to the constitutional right to equality, property rights, and privacy of autonomous vehicles (AV).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0