메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Gurlenova L.V. (Сыктывкарский гос.университет)
저널정보
충북대학교 러시아알타이지역 연구소 러시아학 러시아학 제12권
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
175 - 192 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Russian culture of 1910-1930-s saw a widely spread criticism of nature – man’s natural habitat. It was named “first nature” and assessed as a living space unable to provide adequate living conditions for people. This attitude created a pre-requisite for forming a radical technocratic stand with a focal demand to create a “second nature”, that is the nature that would be constructed by people by means of science and technology. Based on that stand, there emerged a number of projects, utopian in character, seeking to change man’s natural living environment. Their authors perceived the structure of the earth and outer space as a simple mechanical arrangement that could be improved by man. Writers of various ideological and artistic platforms took part in the discussion on improvement of people’s natural living environment. Leaders of the discussion were writers of the proletarian and later industrial subjects (in particular, M. Gorky, A. Platonov, proletarian poets) and representatives of “scientific poetry”. Even peasant writers sympathized with the idea of radical change of nature. Projects on the rebuild of nature were proposed in works of fiction, scientific treatise and publicist essays. A desire to overcome hunger, poverty, inconveniencies of landscape and climate was the driving motivation for authors of such projects. The article considers specific ideas in the abovenamed area proposed by famous representatives of culture of that period – K. Tsiolkovsky, A. Platonov and L. Leonov.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0